Difference between revisions of "Electoral fraud/US"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→2004 Election: rfk article links) |
m (→Links: subsection for 2004 election) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Issues]]There have been repeated claims of election-rigging via defective voting machines in recent US elections, most notably the [[wikipedia:United States presidential election, 2000|2000 presidential election]] in which [[George W. Bush]] was elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%) and the [[wikipedia:United States presidential election, 2004|2004 presidential election]] in which he was re-elected by somewhat less narrow margin (286/538, 53.2%). | [[Category:Issues]]There have been repeated claims of election-rigging via defective voting machines in recent US elections, most notably the [[wikipedia:United States presidential election, 2000|2000 presidential election]] in which [[George W. Bush]] was elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%) and the [[wikipedia:United States presidential election, 2004|2004 presidential election]] in which he was re-elected by somewhat less narrow margin (286/538, 53.2%). | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
| + | ===2004 Election=== | ||
* [http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen Was the 2004 Election Stolen?] by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. | * [http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen Was the 2004 Election Stolen?] by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. | ||
** '''2006-06-07''' [http://www.alternet.org/rights/37153/ RFK Jr: Taking the Stolen Election Seriously]: further analysis by Thom Hartmann (AlterNet) | ** '''2006-06-07''' [http://www.alternet.org/rights/37153/ RFK Jr: Taking the Stolen Election Seriously]: further analysis by Thom Hartmann (AlterNet) | ||
* '''2006-02-23''' [http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/19421.html votes were time-stamped 2 weeks before the election date] ([http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/24/1326217 2006-02-24 slashdot]) | * '''2006-02-23''' [http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/19421.html votes were time-stamped 2 weeks before the election date] ([http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/24/1326217 2006-02-24 slashdot]) | ||
* '''2006-02-22''' [http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/socal/la-me-diebold22feb22,0,33600.story?coll=la-news-politics-local Man Pleads Not Guilty in Voting Device Case][([http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot?m=3948 2006-02-26 slashdot]) | * '''2006-02-22''' [http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/socal/la-me-diebold22feb22,0,33600.story?coll=la-news-politics-local Man Pleads Not Guilty in Voting Device Case][([http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot?m=3948 2006-02-26 slashdot]) | ||
Revision as of 01:25, 24 June 2006
There have been repeated claims of election-rigging via defective voting machines in recent US elections, most notably the 2000 presidential election in which George W. Bush was elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%) and the 2004 presidential election in which he was re-elected by somewhat less narrow margin (286/538, 53.2%).
Links
2004 Election
- Was the 2004 Election Stolen? by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
- 2006-06-07 RFK Jr: Taking the Stolen Election Seriously: further analysis by Thom Hartmann (AlterNet)
- 2006-02-23 votes were time-stamped 2 weeks before the election date (2006-02-24 slashdot)
- 2006-02-22 Man Pleads Not Guilty in Voting Device Case[(2006-02-26 slashdot)