Difference between revisions of "Argument-in-a-box"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (post-move update) |
(another possible term) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
An [[argument-in-a-box]] is a short phrase which implies a [[logical argument]] – or, more precisely, asserts a conclusion and hints at the argument behind it – without actually stating it explicitly. It is a form of [[rhetorical deception]]. | An [[argument-in-a-box]] is a short phrase which implies a [[logical argument]] – or, more precisely, asserts a conclusion and hints at the argument behind it – without actually stating it explicitly. It is a form of [[rhetorical deception]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Another term for this concept might be [[Trojan argument]], where the argument comes wrapped in some sort of attractive packaging -- e.g. something that sounds clever -- and therefore slips a false conclusion past the listener's [[critical thinking]] skills. | ||
==Related== | ==Related== | ||
* [[Special:SearchByProperty/Thing-20type/argument in a box|list]] | * [[Special:SearchByProperty/Thing-20type/argument in a box|list]] | ||
{{seed}} | {{seed}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:27, 14 June 2013
About
An argument-in-a-box is a short phrase which implies a logical argument – or, more precisely, asserts a conclusion and hints at the argument behind it – without actually stating it explicitly. It is a form of rhetorical deception.
Another term for this concept might be Trojan argument, where the argument comes wrapped in some sort of attractive packaging -- e.g. something that sounds clever -- and therefore slips a false conclusion past the listener's critical thinking skills.
Related
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|