Difference between revisions of "US/education/primary/curricula/AP/US History/2014 controversy"

From Issuepedia
< US‎ | education‎ | primary‎ | curricula‎ | AP‎ | US History
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (fixed missing word by rephrasing the sentence (again))
(linkdrop)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
<ref name=TP1>'''2015-02-17''' [http://thinkprogress.org/education/2015/02/17/3623683/oklahoma-lawmakers-vote-overwhleming-ban-advanced-placement-history-class Oklahoma Lawmakers Vote Overwhelmingly To Ban Advanced Placement U.S. History] ([https://plus.google.com/u/0/117800110659124563147/posts/h9XUtTtQHFK via])</ref>
 
<ref name=TP1>'''2015-02-17''' [http://thinkprogress.org/education/2015/02/17/3623683/oklahoma-lawmakers-vote-overwhleming-ban-advanced-placement-history-class Oklahoma Lawmakers Vote Overwhelmingly To Ban Advanced Placement U.S. History] ([https://plus.google.com/u/0/117800110659124563147/posts/h9XUtTtQHFK via])</ref>
 
</references>
 
</references>
 +
===to file===
 +
* '''2015-02-20''' [http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/2015/02/20/texas-joins-oklahoma-on-ap-history-class/ Texas Joins Oklahoma on AP History Class]

Revision as of 23:34, 20 February 2015

About

The 2014 version of the Advanced Placement United States History curriculum received considerable objection from the Right:

Links

Sources

to file