Difference between revisions of "Voting systems"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Hively article now filed, further discussion moved to Electoral College page) |
(video about the 2-party system) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
** [http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/diss/node3.html Voting Systems Overview] | ** [http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/diss/node3.html Voting Systems Overview] | ||
*** [http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/diss/node4.html Vote Aggregation Methods] does not seem to mention [[range voting]], although the author essentially ''uses'' range voting to assess voter preferences in the [http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/diss/node19.html 1992 case study]: "The respondents were asked to rate each of the main candidates in the US Presidential race on a "feeling thermometer" scale that ranged from 0 to 100 -- the higher the number, the more favorable the respondent's feeling toward that candidate." The case for DSV seems based on the idea that voters will always adjust their vote based on how they think other people will vote -- but with range voting, such adjustment is either unnecessary or greatly reduced. So how is DSV superior to range voting? | *** [http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/diss/node4.html Vote Aggregation Methods] does not seem to mention [[range voting]], although the author essentially ''uses'' range voting to assess voter preferences in the [http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/diss/node19.html 1992 case study]: "The respondents were asked to rate each of the main candidates in the US Presidential race on a "feeling thermometer" scale that ranged from 0 to 100 -- the higher the number, the more favorable the respondent's feeling toward that candidate." The case for DSV seems based on the idea that voters will always adjust their vote based on how they think other people will vote -- but with range voting, such adjustment is either unnecessary or greatly reduced. So how is DSV superior to range voting? | ||
| + | ===Video=== | ||
| + | * [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo The Problems with First Past the Post Voting Explained] | ||
| + | ** only partly-related discussion [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/21wL6MNoGCB here] | ||
===News=== | ===News=== | ||
{{links/news}} | {{links/news}} | ||
Revision as of 22:07, 24 June 2015
About
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Reference
- Particular Systems
- Collections & Discussion
- ElectionMethods.org (dead site; archived)
- ElectoRama! wiki
- Voting Simulation Visualizations by Ka-Ping Yee (posted 2005-04-21, updated 2006-07-31)
Related Pages
- virtual voting districts
- InstaGov: a voting-related project on Issuepedia
Links
Reference
Articles
- 1996: Declared-Strategy Voting: An Instrument for Group Decision-Making by Lorrie Faith Cranor
- Voting Systems Overview
- Vote Aggregation Methods does not seem to mention range voting, although the author essentially uses range voting to assess voter preferences in the 1992 case study: "The respondents were asked to rate each of the main candidates in the US Presidential race on a "feeling thermometer" scale that ranged from 0 to 100 -- the higher the number, the more favorable the respondent's feeling toward that candidate." The case for DSV seems based on the idea that voters will always adjust their vote based on how they think other people will vote -- but with range voting, such adjustment is either unnecessary or greatly reduced. So how is DSV superior to range voting?
- Voting Systems Overview
Video
- The Problems with First Past the Post Voting Explained
- only partly-related discussion here