Difference between revisions of "Verizon"
(material moved from HTYP, plus new item from NYT via Working Assets) |
(→Links: 700 MHz frequency auction goings-on) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* [http://verizon.com/ Verizon] main site | * [http://verizon.com/ Verizon] main site | ||
* [http://verizon.net/ Verizon] internet services | * [http://verizon.net/ Verizon] internet services | ||
+ | ===News & Views=== | ||
+ | * '''2007-10-08''' [http://www.saschameinrath.com/2007/oct/08/700_mhz_dramedy_continues The 700 MHz Dramedy Continues]: examples of Verizon's legal maneuvrings over broadcast frequency bandwidth | ||
+ | |||
==Quotes About== | ==Quotes About== | ||
'''2007-09-27''': One of Verizon's lower-tier competitors (so this does need to be verified!) reports: | '''2007-09-27''': One of Verizon's lower-tier competitors (so this does need to be verified!) reports: |
Revision as of 22:59, 8 October 2007
Overview
Verizon is a telecommunications company providing wired and wireless telephone services and internet in the United States. In the areas they serve, they seem to have a monopoly on wired phone services and DSL.
Verizon is apparently against Internet Neutrality (see Sourcewatch:Network neutrality legislation).
Verizon also engages in the practice of having "local toll areas" which, although apparently something of an industry standard practice these days, is still ethically questionable and has resulted in severe overbilling in at least one case (see HTYP for details).
Links
Reference
- HTYP for practical and quality-of-business information
- Wikipedia
Conservapediano article as of 2007-09-29dKosopediano article as of 2007-09-29- SourceWatch
Official
News & Views
- 2007-10-08 The 700 MHz Dramedy Continues: examples of Verizon's legal maneuvrings over broadcast frequency bandwidth
Quotes About
2007-09-27: One of Verizon's lower-tier competitors (so this does need to be verified!) reports:
Will Easton of Working Assets said, in an email on 2007-09-27: |
This morning's New York Times reported that Verizon Wireless last week refused to allow text messages from NARAL Pro-Choice America, calling them too "controversial" and "unsavory." Unsavory? Verizon quickly reversed themselves this morning, under heavy criticism. But this episode only shows Verizon's underlying instinct to silence messages based upon the content of those messages. |
2006-04-27 Verizon has apparently sent faxes to government officials using the names of people who had not authorized those faxes – not just an astroturf campaign, but an illegal one:
Excerpted from http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/04/27/PM200604277.html : |
Edward McKenna is the mayor of Red Bank, New Jersey. In a normal week, he receives about 10 faxes from constituents. In three days last November, McKenna says he got more than 200.
These so-called residents all wrote in support of new legislation to increase competition in the cable industry. McKenna noticed the faxes had names, but no signatures.
He says the traced the fax number back to an organization funded by the telephone giant Verizon. |