2008-04-09 SciAm on Expelled
<hide> <let name=data index=Date>2008-04-09}}{{#vardefine:Topics|\Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed\Scientific American}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Topics}}{{#vardefine:Topics.disp|\Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed\Scientific American}}{{#vardefine:URL|http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/04/sciam_on_expelled.php}}{{#vardefine:keylist%7C{{#var:keylist}}\URL}}{{#vardefine:URL.disp%7Chttp://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/04/sciam_on_expelled.php}}{{#vardefine:Title%7CSciAm on Expelled}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Title}}{{#vardefine:Title.disp|SciAm on Expelled}}{{#vardefine:Text|“First Fox News, now Scientific American gives Expelled both barrels. They dedicated a fair amount of space to ripping into the movie, and you might be wondering if it isn't giving the movie more publicity than it deserves, a question I'm getting asked a lot, too. Of course it is! The controversy is exactly what they want, since it will help put butts in seats. However, this is bad publicity, and what serves our ends is that people see the movie skeptically, and are made aware of the fundamental dishonesty of the makers.”}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Text}}{{#vardefine:Text.disp|“First Fox News, now Scientific American gives Expelled both barrels. They dedicated a fair amount of space to ripping into the movie, and you might be wondering if it isn't giving the movie more publicity than it deserves, a question I'm getting asked a lot, too. Of course it is! The controversy is exactly what they want, since it will help put butts in seats. However, this is bad publicity, and what serves our ends is that people see the movie skeptically, and are made aware of the fundamental dishonesty of the makers.”}} {{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}||}} {{#xploop:{{#var:keylist}}|\n* $s$: \o#var:$s$.disp\c}}