False dilemma

From Issuepedia
Revision as of 16:21, 3 June 2007 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (incorporated material from "choice between extremes", which seems to be really the same thing (despite my earlier attempts to differentiate))
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Overview

A false dilemma is an argument "in which two alternative points of view are held to be the only options" false dilemma [W] when in fact other reasonable options are available.

The false dilemma is often used as a manipulative tool by claiming that the "only other choice" is something which is obviously unreasonable, unpleasant, or unpalatable. The technique is usually used to persuade its audience of a viewpoint that is some distance from a reasonable, "middle ground" solution; the arguer generally wants the audience to dismiss the possibility of a "middle ground" which they might otherwise agree with.

False dilemma arguers will sometimes take steps to prevent any middle-ground choices from being feasible, thus combining the false dilemma with an argument by fiat and/or an argument by force.

Examples

  • The phrase "You're either with us, or you're against us.", often used by George W. Bush and his supporters
  • "You're either part of the solution, or you're part of the problem."

Related

  • In cognitive therapy [W], the false dilemma is called "all-or-nothing thinking" or "black-and-white thinking" and is a form of cognitive distortion [W], i.e. a bad habit-of-thought to be overcome due to its ability to prevent sane, moderate choices from being made.
  • Other names: either-or dichotomy, ignoring the moderate, ignoring the middle, choice between extremes

Reference