Jamesgmartin.center/2025/04/how-to-judge-a-basic-research-proposal/var/$summary

From Issuepedia
< Jamesgmartin.center/2025/04/how-to-judge-a-basic-research-proposal
Revision as of 01:40, 4 April 2025 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{fmt/quote|The reasons for this distrust are many: fraud ''[...]''; thousands of retracted papers (most justified, some not); massive failure to replicate studies; and weak e...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

«The reasons for this distrust are many: fraud [...]; thousands of retracted papers (most justified, some not); massive failure to replicate studies; and weak experimental and analytic methods. Not to mention the authoritarian failure of the medical-science establishment over the Covid epidemic.» ... «Among the causes of these problems are bad incentives on campus and elsewhere, a system that encourages careerism over love of knowledge, and epistemologically irrelevant race-and-sex policies (aka DEI). Another problem, however, is how basic science is funded.»