Difference between revisions of "2008-01-23 Rosenhouse on ID's Predictions"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://www.issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Filing_Room/filing_forms)
 
m (topics lowercase)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<noinclude>[[category:data.links]]</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|2008-01-23}}
 
<noinclude>[[category:data.links]]</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|2008-01-23}}
{{data.pair|Topics|\Intelligent Design\evolution vs. Intelligent Design}}
+
{{data.pair|Topics|\intelligent design\evolution vs. intelligent design}}
 
{{data.pair|URL|2=http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/1/23/23511/5460}}
 
{{data.pair|URL|2=http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/1/23/23511/5460}}
 
{{data.pair|Title|Rosenhouse on ID's "Predictions"}}
 
{{data.pair|Title|Rosenhouse on ID's "Predictions"}}

Revision as of 23:02, 24 January 2008

{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{#vardefine:Date|2008-01-23}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Date}}{{#vardefine:Date.disp|2008-01-23}}{{#vardefine:Date.disp|[[{{#var:Date}}]]}}{{#vardefine:Topics|\intelligent design\evolution vs. intelligent design}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Topics}}{{#vardefine:Topics.disp|\intelligent design\evolution vs. intelligent design}}{{#vardefine:URL|http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/1/23/23511/5460}}{{#vardefine:keylist%7C{{#var:keylist}}\URL}}{{#vardefine:URL.disp%7Chttp://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/1/23/23511/5460}}{{#vardefine:Title%7CRosenhouse on ID's "Predictions"}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Title}}{{#vardefine:Title.disp|Rosenhouse on ID's "Predictions"}}{{#vardefine:Text|“Jason Rosenhouse has an excellent post about Denyse O'Leary's list of ID's alleged predictions. As Jason points out, a prediction in science is how you test a theory. Most predictions are about the nature of evidence that has yet to be found, and he mentions Tiktaalik as an excellent example of such a prediction. Evolution has been remarkably successful at making such predictions. .. O'Leary's predictions, on the other hand, are exactly what we have come to expect from ID advocates - nothing but god of the gaps arguments whose only predictions are that evolution will fail to explain this or that phenomenon.”}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Text}}{{#vardefine:Text.disp|“Jason Rosenhouse has an excellent post about Denyse O'Leary's list of ID's alleged predictions. As Jason points out, a prediction in science is how you test a theory. Most predictions are about the nature of evidence that has yet to be found, and he mentions Tiktaalik as an excellent example of such a prediction. Evolution has been remarkably successful at making such predictions. .. O'Leary's predictions, on the other hand, are exactly what we have come to expect from ID advocates - nothing but god of the gaps arguments whose only predictions are that evolution will fail to explain this or that phenomenon.”}} {{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}||}} {{#xploop:{{#var:keylist}}|\n* $s$: \o#var:$s$.disp\c}}

  • Topic pages:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}
  • Topic categories:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}