Difference between revisions of "2009-05-31 Why do people persist in voting Republican/woozle/2009"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Midian (round 4): not finished, but it's time to pick up the kids)
(→‎Woozle (round 4) -- in progress: just a bit more; not done)
Line 559: Line 559:
  
  
I think this is completely backwards.
+
I think this is almost completely backwards.
  
 
To paraphrase the gun lobby: Take away the legitimate power and money, and only the illegitimate will remain enriched and powerful.
 
To paraphrase the gun lobby: Take away the legitimate power and money, and only the illegitimate will remain enriched and powerful.
Line 567: Line 567:
 
It's like arguing that because one team has a habit of bribing referees, we should have fewer referees or pay them less. (The fact that this corrupt team is using their ill-gotten gains to promote the idea of referee-reduction does not add any legitimacy to the idea.)
 
It's like arguing that because one team has a habit of bribing referees, we should have fewer referees or pay them less. (The fact that this corrupt team is using their ill-gotten gains to promote the idea of referee-reduction does not add any legitimacy to the idea.)
  
''saving work; still in progress. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 20:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)''
+
: [M] ''"How did the government function until 1913, prior to income tax?"''
 +
 
 +
That ''is'' very much a legitimate question. Some possible answers are obvious, but I'm leery of "obvious" answers; I'd like to know what the actual reasoning and facts were that led to this decision.
 +
 
 +
Wikipedia [[wikipedia:Income tax in the United States|gives the following history]]:
 +
* '''1861''': First US personal income tax ever, to help pay for the Civil War -- 3% of all incomes over $800
 +
* '''1862''': The above tax is repealed and replaced by another one.
 +
* '''1894''': the Wilson-Gorman tariff imposes the first US peacetime income tax -- 2% on income over $4000, fewer than 10% of households had to pay anything. Purpose was "to make up for revenue that would be lost by tariff reductions." (Whose tariffs were being reduced, and why? Suspicious.)
 +
* '''1895''': Supreme Court [[wikipedia:Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.|rules]] that taxes on property rents are unconstitutional; however, the "Court affirmed that the Constitution did not deny Congress the power to impose a tax on real and personal property."
 +
* '''1913''': States ratify the [[wikipedia:Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|16th Amendment]], allowing "Congress to levy an income tax without apportioning it among the states or basing it on Census results" and overruling Pollock re taxing property rents.
 +
 
 +
''still in progress... time to start dinner. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 21:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)''

Revision as of 21:10, 30 November 2009