Difference between revisions of "9-11/truth"
< 9-11
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(some reorg - "groups" now under "projects"; more entities listed.) |
(→Groups: 911JC) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| − | '''9/11 Truth''' is a term adopted by those who advocate a new investigation into the events of [[9-11]], arguing that [[../anomalies|discrepancies]] between the [[../official|official story]] and the available evidence, as well as evidence of improper conduct during those investigations, render the official conclusions not credible. | + | '''9/11 Truth''' (also referred to as the "9/11 Truth movement" and [[/antipathy|derogatorily]] as "[[truther]]s") is a term adopted by those who advocate a new investigation into the events of [[9-11]], arguing that [[../anomalies|discrepancies]] between the [[../official|official story]] and the available evidence, as well as evidence of improper conduct during those investigations, render the official conclusions not credible. |
| + | |||
| + | For reasons which are not yet clear, 9/11 Truth advocates evoke a considerable amount of [[/antipathy|antipathy]] in mainstream America. | ||
| + | |||
==Projects== | ==Projects== | ||
===Information=== | ===Information=== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 16: | ||
* [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice]] ([http://stj911.org/ web]) | * [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice]] ([http://stj911.org/ web]) | ||
** recommended by 9/11 Research | ** recommended by 9/11 Research | ||
| + | |||
| + | Groups not yet evaluated: | ||
| + | * [[911JusticeCampaign]] ([http://911justicecampaign.org/ web]) | ||
| + | |||
===Periodicals=== | ===Periodicals=== | ||
* [[Journal of 9/11 Studues]] ([http://www.journalof911studies.com/ web]): "It is now our belief that the case for falsity of the official explanation is so well established and demonstrated by papers in this Journal that there is little to be gained from accepting more papers here. Instead we encourage all potential contributors to prepare papers suitable for the more established journals in which scientists might more readily place their trust." Gives links to publications in more mainstream scientific journals. | * [[Journal of 9/11 Studues]] ([http://www.journalof911studies.com/ web]): "It is now our belief that the case for falsity of the official explanation is so well established and demonstrated by papers in this Journal that there is little to be gained from accepting more papers here. Instead we encourage all potential contributors to prepare papers suitable for the more established journals in which scientists might more readily place their trust." Gives links to publications in more mainstream scientific journals. | ||
Latest revision as of 01:06, 22 June 2014
Overview
9/11 Truth (also referred to as the "9/11 Truth movement" and derogatorily as "truthers") is a term adopted by those who advocate a new investigation into the events of 9-11, arguing that discrepancies between the official story and the available evidence, as well as evidence of improper conduct during those investigations, render the official conclusions not credible.
For reasons which are not yet clear, 9/11 Truth advocates evoke a considerable amount of antipathy in mainstream America.
Projects
Information
- 9/11 Research (web): a well-organized catalog of information
Groups
The following groups seem to be the informal organizational core of the non-centralized "9/11 Truth movement".
- Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (web): "874 architectural and engineering professionals"
- recommended by 9/11 Research
- Fire Fighters for 9/11 Truth (web)
- Patriots Question 9/11 (web): "200+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials", as well as a cross-section of other professions (engineers, educators, pilots...) - may have some cross-membership with the other groups listed here
- Pilots for 9/11 Truth (web)
- Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice (web)
- recommended by 9/11 Research
Groups not yet evaluated:
Periodicals
- Journal of 9/11 Studues (web): "It is now our belief that the case for falsity of the official explanation is so well established and demonstrated by papers in this Journal that there is little to be gained from accepting more papers here. Instead we encourage all potential contributors to prepare papers suitable for the more established journals in which scientists might more readily place their trust." Gives links to publications in more mainstream scientific journals.
Links
Reference
- Wikipedia
Conservapedia: no information as of 2009-09-20
dKosopediaSourceWatch
