Difference between revisions of "Appeal to guilt"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 65.189.239.67 (Talk) to last version by Woozle)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
+
<hide>
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]An [[appeal to guilt]] is a form of [[emotional argument]] in which the target is encouraged to feel guilty or shameful for holding the views for which they are arguing, often by ascribing unprovably-false motives to the target, or motives which may seem "obviously true" even though they are not.
+
[[page type::article]]
 
+
[[thing type::rhetorical deception]]
'''Also known as''': appeal to shame
+
[[thing type::appeal to negative emotion]]
 +
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]
 +
[[category:emotional appeals]]
 +
</hide>
 +
==About==
 +
An [[appeal to guilt]] is a form of [[appeal to negative emotion]] in which the target is encouraged to feel guilty for holding the views for which they are arguing, often by ascribing false motives to the target, or motives which may seem "obviously" true despite not being true at all.
 +
==Related==
 +
* The [[appeal to guilt]] is very similar to the [[appeal to shame]]. The difference (tentatively) is that "shame" is more about the fear of social disapproval, while "guilt" is an appeal to one's own [[moral]] sense.
 
==Validity==
 
==Validity==
The "appeal to guilt" is acceptable as a way of ''shaming'' an opponent into accepting an otherwise-valid argument when logic and reason have failed. Use of the "appeal to guilt" does not automatically invalidate the substance of the argument in which it is used; it is more of a signal that there may be unspoken assumptions which need to be examined more closely.
+
The "appeal to guilt" may be acceptable as a way of ''guilting'' an opponent into accepting an otherwise-valid argument when logic and reason have failed; see [[rhetorical deception/valid uses]] for further discussion.

Revision as of 11:39, 12 December 2016

About

An appeal to guilt is a form of appeal to negative emotion in which the target is encouraged to feel guilty for holding the views for which they are arguing, often by ascribing false motives to the target, or motives which may seem "obviously" true despite not being true at all.

Related

  • The appeal to guilt is very similar to the appeal to shame. The difference (tentatively) is that "shame" is more about the fear of social disapproval, while "guilt" is an appeal to one's own moral sense.

Validity

The "appeal to guilt" may be acceptable as a way of guilting an opponent into accepting an otherwise-valid argument when logic and reason have failed; see rhetorical deception/valid uses for further discussion.