Appeal to nature

From Issuepedia
Revision as of 18:19, 24 October 2008 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (→‎Overview: more wit' da clever witty stuff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Overview

An appeal to nature is a claim that something is good or right because it is "natural", or that something is bad or wrong because it is unnatural.

This equation is generally regarded as a fallacy for the following reasons:

  • Most of civilization is inherently "unnatural", e.g. wearing clothes.
    • Any argument based on the assumption that "unnatural" means "bad" therefore must grant that wearing clothing is wrong.
    • Any discussion in which this argument is used is maligning the framework of civil discourse in which the discussion is taking place; hitting the other person over the head with a rock is therefore an appropriate rebuttal, since it is an entirely natural response.
  • The large number of obvious counterexamples. You wouldn't, say, defend a shark's right to attack swimmers (much less a vicious dog's right to maim children) just because that was its natural tendency, or make laws requiring that people behave more like chimpanzees.

Validity

As with many fallacies, there is a grain of validity to it – in this case, the fact that if something is done in nature, it may be somehow vital to survival, otherwise known as the argument from survival.

Reference