Difference between revisions of "Category:Debates"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Pages containing debates, preferably structured – which, so far, all of them are. If Issuepedia ends up including records of any ''non''-structured debates,...)
 
(examples)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Pages containing debates, preferably [[structured debate|structured]] – which, so far, all of them are. If [[Issuepedia]] ends up including records of any ''non''-structured debates, we may need to re-categorize the existing debates as "[[:category:structured debates|structured debates]]", but for now...
+
Pages containing [[structured debate]]s. Records of non-structured debates should be filed under [[:category:debates/informal]] and, if they cover useful territory, mapped into corresponding structured debates.
 +
 
 +
Note that some of the pages listed below may not follow the most current rules, as they were all constructed by hand as the rules were being developed. (Hopefully we will have some rule-enforcing code online soon, and then all the debates can be modified to use that code.)
 +
 
 +
Some particularly interesting examples:
 +
* [[2008 sacred wafer scandal/John Pieret vs. Woozle]]: very involved discussion; doesn't currently show which statement-branches have been negated, however.
 +
* [[9-11/anomalies/collapse/debate]]: similar to the above
 +
* [[Abortion is murder]]: less involved debate, but ''does'' show chains of negation
 +
* [[Thomas Jefferson]]: a fairly simple debate-set, but shows proper usage of markup and chains of negation

Latest revision as of 12:01, 1 October 2019

Pages containing structured debates. Records of non-structured debates should be filed under category:debates/informal and, if they cover useful territory, mapped into corresponding structured debates.

Note that some of the pages listed below may not follow the most current rules, as they were all constructed by hand as the rules were being developed. (Hopefully we will have some rule-enforcing code online soon, and then all the debates can be modified to use that code.)

Some particularly interesting examples: