Difference between revisions of "Marriage"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Marriage ENJOYING BRIAN PEPPERS DAY? moved to Marriage over redirect: vandalism reversion)
(→‎Overview: some additional text about modern usage; spelling fixes)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Overview==
 
==Overview==
The institution of [[marriage]] is recognized throughout the world. Traditionally, marriage slightly different functions depending on the class of the people involed; for the lower classes, it was mainly a way to formalize the responsibility for the care of offspring. Among upper classes (at least in the [[western civilization|West]]), it was also a way to seal bonds between aristocratic houses – sort of a familial corporate merger.
+
The institution of [[marriage]] is recognized throughout the world. Traditionally, marriage has had slightly different functions depending on the [[social class]] of the participants; for the lower classes, it was mainly a way to formalize the responsibility for the care of offspring. Among upper classes (at least in the [[western civilization|West]]), it was also a way to seal bonds between aristocratic houses – sort of a familial corporate merger.
  
The following problems exist with marriage as it exists in modern western society:
+
In modern, middle-class usage, it has become somewhat ambiguous in its ethical intent, though it is ''usually'' regarded as a requirement for having offspring. In the [[United States]], it is necessary in order to get a lower "family rate" on [[health insurance]] (or to share a lower, employer-sponsored insurance rate with a spouse not employed at the same company).
 +
===Problems===
 +
The following problems exist with marriage as it exists in modern [[western society]]:
 
* It is a binding contract...
 
* It is a binding contract...
 
** ...whose terms are not printed on the page you sign (and indeed are not easy to find)
 
** ...whose terms are not printed on the page you sign (and indeed are not easy to find)
 
** ...whose terms can change depending on where you are (in the {{USA}}, marriage laws vary by state; elsewhere they vary by country)
 
** ...whose terms can change depending on where you are (in the {{USA}}, marriage laws vary by state; elsewhere they vary by country)
** ...whose terms can change over time, with no notification to the signees
+
** ...whose terms can change over time, with no notification to the signers
 
* It limits the family unit to one man and one woman plus any offspring, [[war on the family|severely restricting]] the size and possible configurations of the adult contingent of a family unit
 
* It limits the family unit to one man and one woman plus any offspring, [[war on the family|severely restricting]] the size and possible configurations of the adult contingent of a family unit
 
** ''many [[conservative]] religious groups see this rule as essential, however, and are fighting to prevent reform''
 
** ''many [[conservative]] religious groups see this rule as essential, however, and are fighting to prevent reform''
 
* The terms are asymmetrical and discriminatory by gender
 
* The terms are asymmetrical and discriminatory by gender
* The exit terms are typically vague, or at least do not spell out the full reality of the actions necessary to dissolve the marriage (lawyers are typically required in order to successfully navigate through the necessary paperwork)
+
* The exit terms are typically vague, or at least do not spell out the full reality of the actions necessary to dissolve the marriage ([[lawyer]]s are typically required in order to successfully navigate through the necessary paperwork)
  
 
In other cultures, marriage is sometimes less restricting; further study is warranted to determine how well various forms of marriage work, and in what specific ways they fail and succeed.
 
In other cultures, marriage is sometimes less restricting; further study is warranted to determine how well various forms of marriage work, and in what specific ways they fail and succeed.
Line 17: Line 19:
  
 
In the {{USA}}, one big incentive to get married is the reduction in [[US health care costs|health insurance costs]]. One's spouse is also considered to be "next of kin" and thus receives certain automatic rights, such as hospital visitation and effective [[power of attorney]] if the other spouse is unable to speak for her/himself.
 
In the {{USA}}, one big incentive to get married is the reduction in [[US health care costs|health insurance costs]]. One's spouse is also considered to be "next of kin" and thus receives certain automatic rights, such as hospital visitation and effective [[power of attorney]] if the other spouse is unable to speak for her/himself.
 +
 
==Related Pages==
 
==Related Pages==
 
* [[gay marriage]]: an issue mainly in the {{USA}}
 
* [[gay marriage]]: an issue mainly in the {{USA}}

Revision as of 16:47, 24 August 2008

Overview

The institution of marriage is recognized throughout the world. Traditionally, marriage has had slightly different functions depending on the social class of the participants; for the lower classes, it was mainly a way to formalize the responsibility for the care of offspring. Among upper classes (at least in the West), it was also a way to seal bonds between aristocratic houses – sort of a familial corporate merger.

In modern, middle-class usage, it has become somewhat ambiguous in its ethical intent, though it is usually regarded as a requirement for having offspring. In the United States, it is necessary in order to get a lower "family rate" on health insurance (or to share a lower, employer-sponsored insurance rate with a spouse not employed at the same company).

Problems

The following problems exist with marriage as it exists in modern western society:

  • It is a binding contract...
    • ...whose terms are not printed on the page you sign (and indeed are not easy to find)
    • ...whose terms can change depending on where you are (in the United States, marriage laws vary by state; elsewhere they vary by country)
    • ...whose terms can change over time, with no notification to the signers
  • It limits the family unit to one man and one woman plus any offspring, severely restricting the size and possible configurations of the adult contingent of a family unit
    • many conservative religious groups see this rule as essential, however, and are fighting to prevent reform
  • The terms are asymmetrical and discriminatory by gender
  • The exit terms are typically vague, or at least do not spell out the full reality of the actions necessary to dissolve the marriage (lawyers are typically required in order to successfully navigate through the necessary paperwork)

In other cultures, marriage is sometimes less restricting; further study is warranted to determine how well various forms of marriage work, and in what specific ways they fail and succeed.

Incentives

Governments and cultures generally have laws and rules to encourage people to get married.

In the United States, one big incentive to get married is the reduction in health insurance costs. One's spouse is also considered to be "next of kin" and thus receives certain automatic rights, such as hospital visitation and effective power of attorney if the other spouse is unable to speak for her/himself.

Related Pages

Quotes

from The Kreutzer Sonata (1889), by Leo Tolstoy:

"And yet the transition state is terrible. People feel that haphazard sin is inadmissible. It is necessary in some way or other to regulate the sexual relations; but there exists no other foundation than the old one, in which nobody longer believes? People marry in the old fashion, without believing in what they do, and the result is falsehood, violence. When it is falsehood alone, it is easily endured. The husband and wife simply deceive the world by professing to live monogamically. If they really are polygamous and polyandrous, it is bad, but acceptable. But when, as often happens, the husband and the wife have taken upon themselves the obligation to live together all their lives (they themselves do not know why), and from the second month have already a desire to separate, but continue to live together just the same, then comes that infernal existence in which they resort to drink, in which they fire revolvers, in which they assassinate each other, in which they poison each other."

...

"All marry in this way. And I did like the rest. If the young people who dream of the honeymoon only knew what a disillusion it is, and always a disillusion! I really do not know why all think it necessary to conceal it.

"One day I was walking among the shows in Paris, when, attracted by a sign, I entered an establishment to see a bearded woman and a water-dog. The woman was a man in disguise, and the dog was an ordinary dog, covered with a sealskin, and swimming in a bath. It was not in the least interesting, but the Barnum accompanied me to the exit very courteously, and, in addressing the people who were coming in, made an appeal to my testimony. 'Ask the gentleman if it is not worth seeing! Come in, come in! It only costs a franc!' And in my confusion I did not dare to answer that there was nothing curious to be seen, and it was upon my false shame that the Barnum must have counted.

"It must be the same with the persons who have passed through the abominations of the honeymoon. They do not dare to undeceive their neighbor. And I did the same.

Notes

Historical alternatives to "one man + one woman" marriage:

Links

Reference

Filed Links

  1. redirect template:links/smw