Difference between revisions of "Religion in politics"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Links: campaign season on planet Glox)
(polished overview; added filed links)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Issues]]{{seed}}
+
[[Category:US.issues]]{{seed}}
==Opinionated Overview==
+
==Overview==
Religious fundamentalists or evangelists who attain office and who openly make political decisions based on their faith are a problem. This is partly because they tend to make those decisions based upon what I would consider to be questionable values, but also partly (and more generally) because they tend to be extremists for the religious viewpoint. (Additional discussion or links regarding why this is or isn't a bad thing would be useful for this article.) --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 06:19, 16 Feb 2006 (CST)
+
This is mainly a problem in the {{USA}}.
 +
 
 +
[[Religious]] fundamentalists or evangelists who attain office and who openly make political decisions based on their faith are a problem. This is partly because they tend to make those decisions based upon values which are often both ethically questionable ''and'' unavailable for questioning (due to their supposed basis in [[faith]] rather than [[reason]]). More generally, they also tend to be [[extremist]]s in advocating the viewpoint of their particular religion, rather than supporting [[religious freedom]] (one of the [[US founding principles|founding principles of the United States]]) much less the right to [[freedom from religion]].
 +
 
 +
For similar reasons, religious groups actively supporting a particular candidate are a problem. This violates the US's [[separation of church and state]] and the terms of religious tax-exemption, and tends to be indicative of a [[powermongery|power-oriented agenda]] rather than one which is truly in the best interests of its members.
 
==Related Pages==
 
==Related Pages==
 
* [[separation of church and state]]
 
* [[separation of church and state]]
 
* [[Ten Commandments]]
 
* [[Ten Commandments]]
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
* [http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9178374/gods_senator God's senator]: Sam Brownback
+
===Filed Links===
 +
{{links.tagged}}
 +
===Articles===
 +
* [http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9178374/gods_senator God's senator]: [[Sam Brownback]]
 
* [http://www.vanityfair.com/commentary/content/articles/051128roco02 American "Rapture"]
 
* [http://www.vanityfair.com/commentary/content/articles/051128roco02 American "Rapture"]
 
===humor===
 
===humor===
 
* '''2007-05-29''' (comic) [http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=22368 This Modern World: Campaign season on planet Glox!]
 
* '''2007-05-29''' (comic) [http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=22368 This Modern World: Campaign season on planet Glox!]

Revision as of 22:56, 24 January 2008

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

Overview

This is mainly a problem in the United States.

Religious fundamentalists or evangelists who attain office and who openly make political decisions based on their faith are a problem. This is partly because they tend to make those decisions based upon values which are often both ethically questionable and unavailable for questioning (due to their supposed basis in faith rather than reason). More generally, they also tend to be extremists in advocating the viewpoint of their particular religion, rather than supporting religious freedom (one of the founding principles of the United States) much less the right to freedom from religion.

For similar reasons, religious groups actively supporting a particular candidate are a problem. This violates the US's separation of church and state and the terms of religious tax-exemption, and tends to be indicative of a power-oriented agenda rather than one which is truly in the best interests of its members.

Related Pages

Links

Filed Links

  1. redirect template:links/smw

Articles

humor