Difference between revisions of "Shirley exception"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<hide> page type::article thing type::belief thing type::myth </hide> ==About== A Shirley exception is a mythical exception to a draconian law, so named becaus...")
 
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* the [[fair world fallacy]]: "this law will never be enforced in a way that is unfair"
 
* the [[fair world fallacy]]: "this law will never be enforced in a way that is unfair"
 
* [[personal exceptionalism]] / [[leopards ate my face]]: "this law will never affect ''me'' or other people I know with legitimate needs"
 
* [[personal exceptionalism]] / [[leopards ate my face]]: "this law will never affect ''me'' or other people I know with legitimate needs"
* [[privilege blindness]]: people who aren't aware that ''their'' experiences being given exceptions
+
* [[privilege blindness]]: people who aren't aware that ''their'' experience of being granted exceptions is not the norm
 +
 
 
==History==
 
==History==
 
The term appears to have originated with a [[/origin|2018 Twitter thread]], and has gained new significance in the wake of abortion bans in several states after the [[Death of Roe]].
 
The term appears to have originated with a [[/origin|2018 Twitter thread]], and has gained new significance in the wake of abortion bans in several states after the [[Death of Roe]].

Latest revision as of 15:03, 22 October 2022

About

A Shirley exception is a mythical exception to a draconian law, so named because supporters of the law will argue that "surely there will be exceptions for truly legitimate needs" even in cases where the law does not in fact provide any.

It appears to play on a combination of factors:

History

The term appears to have originated with a 2018 Twitter thread, and has gained new significance in the wake of abortion bans in several states after the Death of Roe.

Links