Difference between revisions of "US military readiness"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Under the presidency of [[George W. Bush]], however, US military readiness has plunged to dangerously low levels; as of this writing, we are not prepared to deal with even a ''single'' significant event, much less two.
 
Under the presidency of [[George W. Bush]], however, US military readiness has plunged to dangerously low levels; as of this writing, we are not prepared to deal with even a ''single'' significant event, much less two.
  
As typical with every Democrat president after Kennedy, former President Clinton cut the military, and President Bush (43) has waited until the military was already engaged to take the time to increase its size.
+
As typical with every Democrat president after Kennedy ''(is this true? see [[#Notes]] -[[User:Woozle|W]].)'', [[Bill Clinton|former President Clinton]] cut the [[US military spending|military]], and President Bush (43) has waited until the military was already engaged to take the time to increase its size.
 
{{seed}}
 
{{seed}}
  
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* '''2006-01-24''' [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/01/24/national/w133017S88.DTL Study: Army Stretched to Breaking Point] (alt: [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11009829/ MSNBC], [http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-01-24-army-study_x.htm USA Today], [http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1153175,00.html Time], [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4649066.stm BBC News])
 
* '''2006-01-24''' [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/01/24/national/w133017S88.DTL Study: Army Stretched to Breaking Point] (alt: [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11009829/ MSNBC], [http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-01-24-army-study_x.htm USA Today], [http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1153175,00.html Time], [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4649066.stm BBC News])
 
* '''2005-01-06''' [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/01/06/MNG2VALREE1.DTL Army Reserve breaking down, general warns; mission failure imminent]
 
* '''2005-01-06''' [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/01/06/MNG2VALREE1.DTL Army Reserve breaking down, general warns; mission failure imminent]
 +
==Notes==
 +
[[User:Midian|Midian]] added "As typical with every Democrat president after Kennedy, [[Bill Clinton|former President Clinton]] cut the military, and President [[George W. Bush|Bush]] [[43rd US Presidential administration|(43)]] has waited until the military was already engaged to take the time to increase its size." Clinton was at the tail-end of a decades-long gradual decline in military spending since the end of World War II; not all Democrats have cut military funding, and not all Republicans have increased it. See [[US Military Spending]] for more data.

Revision as of 21:11, 10 September 2006

Overview

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina (not to mention the highly successful 1994 Balkan Intervention) it should be obvious (even to the liberal-minded) that the military is important for reasons other than killing people (a reputation strong in recent memory due largely to the unfortunate way they were used in Viet Nam).

Under the presidency of George W. Bush, however, US military readiness has plunged to dangerously low levels; as of this writing, we are not prepared to deal with even a single significant event, much less two.

As typical with every Democrat president after Kennedy (is this true? see #Notes -W.), former President Clinton cut the military, and President Bush (43) has waited until the military was already engaged to take the time to increase its size.

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

Links

Notes

Midian added "As typical with every Democrat president after Kennedy, former President Clinton cut the military, and President Bush (43) has waited until the military was already engaged to take the time to increase its size." Clinton was at the tail-end of a decades-long gradual decline in military spending since the end of World War II; not all Democrats have cut military funding, and not all Republicans have increased it. See US Military Spending for more data.