Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/21st Century Primary School Curriculum"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(notes... head foggy, try to find longer writeup later...) |
(→Critical Thinking: rationalization) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Identifying [[factual claim]]s within various sources (news articles, advertising...) | * Identifying [[factual claim]]s within various sources (news articles, advertising...) | ||
* Spotting the major types of [[logical fallacy]] and [[rhetorical deception]] | * Spotting the major types of [[logical fallacy]] and [[rhetorical deception]] | ||
| + | * Detecting post-hoc justification ([[rationalization]]) | ||
| + | |||
==Spine Lessons== | ==Spine Lessons== | ||
* Knowing your rights as a citizen in a free society, both in principle and (advanced) under specific laws | * Knowing your rights as a citizen in a free society, both in principle and (advanced) under specific laws | ||
* Knowing how to judge reasonably when you are in the right vs. when you just "feel wronged" (so you don't erroneously excuse instances of genuine rights-violation as unfounded) | * Knowing how to judge reasonably when you are in the right vs. when you just "feel wronged" (so you don't erroneously excuse instances of genuine rights-violation as unfounded) | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 26 July 2009
The following are areas of education which, although important in earlier ages, have become even more so. They are also largely overlooked, neglected, or even counteracted in most primary school curricula.
Critical Thinking
I know I've written out lists of specifics on this one at least once or twice, but at the moment I can't remember where.
- Identifying factual claims within various sources (news articles, advertising...)
- Spotting the major types of logical fallacy and rhetorical deception
- Detecting post-hoc justification (rationalization)
Spine Lessons
- Knowing your rights as a citizen in a free society, both in principle and (advanced) under specific laws
- Knowing how to judge reasonably when you are in the right vs. when you just "feel wronged" (so you don't erroneously excuse instances of genuine rights-violation as unfounded)