Difference between revisions of "Global warming/skepticism/arguments/notes/1"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'It is often alleged that scientists are more or less evenly balanced on this issue; [http://issuepedia.org/index.php?title=Arguments_against_global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=20003 …')
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
It is often alleged that scientists are more or less evenly balanced on this issue; [http://issuepedia.org/index.php?title=Arguments_against_global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=20003 an anonymous edit to Issuepedia on 2010-07-08] even tried to insert this claim by changing "the majority" to "many" and "a few" to "just as many". This claim is untrue; the proportion of qualified scientists (i.e. those in climate science or related fields) who agree with anthropogenic global warming is something in excess of 99%.[[category:suspicious edits]]
+
[[category:!article]]It is often alleged that scientists are more or less evenly balanced on this issue; [http://issuepedia.org/index.php?title=Arguments_against_global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=20003 an anonymous edit to Issuepedia on 2010-07-08] even tried to insert this claim by changing "the majority" to "many" and "a few" to "just as many". This claim is untrue; the proportion of qualified scientists (i.e. those in climate science or related fields) who agree with anthropogenic global warming is something in excess of 99%.[[category:suspicious edits]]

Latest revision as of 16:04, 26 December 2010

It is often alleged that scientists are more or less evenly balanced on this issue; an anonymous edit to Issuepedia on 2010-07-08 even tried to insert this claim by changing "the majority" to "many" and "a few" to "just as many". This claim is untrue; the proportion of qualified scientists (i.e. those in climate science or related fields) who agree with anthropogenic global warming is something in excess of 99%.