Difference between revisions of "Intelligent design/objections"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(moved non-ID-specific links over to Evo vs. direct creation) |
(→Related Articles: moved religion vs. science link to evo vs. direct creation) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
The OSC analysis linked below seems a pretty reasonable treatment of a solution (Intelligent Design may be in agreement with his beliefs, but it is based on religion rather than science, and schools have no business teaching religion), but it remains to be seen whether it will be accepted by the vast majority of those supporting ID. (See the {{talk page}} for further discussion.) | The OSC analysis linked below seems a pretty reasonable treatment of a solution (Intelligent Design may be in agreement with his beliefs, but it is based on religion rather than science, and schools have no business teaching religion), but it remains to be seen whether it will be accepted by the vast majority of those supporting ID. (See the {{talk page}} for further discussion.) | ||
| − | ==Related | + | ==Related Pages== |
* [[Creation]] | * [[Creation]] | ||
** [[Evolution]] | ** [[Evolution]] | ||
** [[Intelligent Design]] | ** [[Intelligent Design]] | ||
* As a dispute over interpretation of available data, [[evolution vs. Intelligent Design]] is essentially the same argument as the ever-popular [[evolution vs. direct creation]], and they both are basically [[criticisms of evolution]] with [[interventionist models of creation]] offered as much more sensible and reasonable explanations by comparison. | * As a dispute over interpretation of available data, [[evolution vs. Intelligent Design]] is essentially the same argument as the ever-popular [[evolution vs. direct creation]], and they both are basically [[criticisms of evolution]] with [[interventionist models of creation]] offered as much more sensible and reasonable explanations by comparison. | ||
| − | + | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20060519011013/http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/featured_articles/v12n02_other_ID_theories.php The Other Intelligent Design Theories] by [[David Brin]] | * [http://web.archive.org/web/20060519011013/http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/featured_articles/v12n02_other_ID_theories.php The Other Intelligent Design Theories] by [[David Brin]] | ||
* [http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/050922_ID_main.html Intelligent Design: An Ambiguous Assault on Evolution] at LiveScience | * [http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/050922_ID_main.html Intelligent Design: An Ambiguous Assault on Evolution] at LiveScience | ||
Revision as of 16:19, 14 December 2006
Overview
Intelligent Design (ID) is often proposed as a viable alternative to the theory of Evolution. Mainstream scientists generally agree that ID is not a viable theory, but the challenges continue – and many of the arguments advanced by the ID camp are appealing and quite difficult to refute.
Notes
The OSC analysis linked below seems a pretty reasonable treatment of a solution (Intelligent Design may be in agreement with his beliefs, but it is based on religion rather than science, and schools have no business teaching religion), but it remains to be seen whether it will be accepted by the vast majority of those supporting ID. (See the talk page for further discussion.)
Related Pages
- Creation
- As a dispute over interpretation of available data, evolution vs. Intelligent Design is essentially the same argument as the ever-popular evolution vs. direct creation, and they both are basically criticisms of evolution with interventionist models of creation offered as much more sensible and reasonable explanations by comparison.