Difference between revisions of "Intelligent design/objections"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Analyses: talkorigins) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [[User:Woozle/Evolution vs. Intelligent Design|a biased analysis]] by Woozle | * [[User:Woozle/Evolution vs. Intelligent Design|a biased analysis]] by Woozle | ||
* [http://greensboro.rhinotimes.com/story.html?id=1142 Creation and Evolution in the Schools] by [[Orson Scott Card]] (2006-01-12) | * [http://greensboro.rhinotimes.com/story.html?id=1142 Creation and Evolution in the Schools] by [[Orson Scott Card]] (2006-01-12) | ||
| + | ==Links== | ||
| + | * [http://www.talkorigins.org/ Talk.Origins newsgroup archive]: mostly "exploring the creation/evolution controversy" | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 23 January 2006
Intelligent Design (ID) is often proposed as a viable alternative to the theory of Evolution. Mainstream scientists generally agree that ID is not a viable theory, but the challenges continue – and many of the arguments advanced by the ID camp are appealing and quite difficult to refute.
Notes
The OSC analysis linked below seems a pretty reasonable treatment of a solution, but it remains to be seen whether it will be accepted by the vast majority of those supporting ID.
Related Articles
Analyses
- a biased analysis by Woozle
- Creation and Evolution in the Schools by Orson Scott Card (2006-01-12)
Links
- Talk.Origins newsgroup archive: mostly "exploring the creation/evolution controversy"