Difference between revisions of "Conservatism"
m (Woozle moved page Political conservatism to Conservatism over redirect: rearranging this and related terms) |
(this page also still needs work) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[page type::article]] | [[page type::article]] | ||
[[thing type::similarity cluster]] | [[thing type::similarity cluster]] | ||
| − | [[category:political | + | [[category:political philosophy]] |
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:ism]] |
</hide> | </hide> | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Conservatism]] is a [[political identity]] whose adherents claim loyalty to a [[similarity cluster|loose collection]] of {{l/sub|belief}}s, but which is ultimately grounded in [[authoritarianism]]. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | It should be understood that [[conservatism]], despite the name, does not [[conserve]] anything except the power of an established hierarchy; see {{l/sub|nym}}ography. It is more or less a policy of lying (to the public and to each other) in support of the agendas of the powerful. | |
| + | ==Pages== | ||
| + | * {{l/sub|pos}}itions of conservatism, both claimed and actual | ||
| + | * {{l/sub|nym}}ography: the terminological landscape | ||
| + | * {{l/sub|US}}: conservatist identity in the United States | ||
| + | * {{l/sub|asymmetry}}: the rules do not apply equally | ||
===Related=== | ===Related=== | ||
* The [[conservative ideal]] encompasses what is best about conservatism, and ways in which the idea of conservatism is misrepresented or misused. | * The [[conservative ideal]] encompasses what is best about conservatism, and ways in which the idea of conservatism is misrepresented or misused. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
* [[US conservatism]] | * [[US conservatism]] | ||
* {{rationalwiki|conservative}} has a good run-down of what "conservative" means in a number of different countries. | * {{rationalwiki|conservative}} has a good run-down of what "conservative" means in a number of different countries. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Social Conservatism=== | ===Social Conservatism=== | ||
| Line 52: | Line 42: | ||
* {{sourcewatch}} | * {{sourcewatch}} | ||
* {{rationalwiki}} (redirects to {{l/rw|Conservative}}) | * {{rationalwiki}} (redirects to {{l/rw|Conservative}}) | ||
| − | === | + | ===Orgs (non-US)=== |
| − | + | * [[wikipedia:Christian Voice (UK)|Christian Voice]] (UK) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{links/smw}} | {{links/smw}} | ||
Revision as of 00:57, 13 October 2022
About
Conservatism is a political identity whose adherents claim loyalty to a loose collection of beliefs, but which is ultimately grounded in authoritarianism.
It should be understood that conservatism, despite the name, does not conserve anything except the power of an established hierarchy; see nymography. It is more or less a policy of lying (to the public and to each other) in support of the agendas of the powerful.
Pages
- positions of conservatism, both claimed and actual
- nymography: the terminological landscape
- US: conservatist identity in the United States
- asymmetry: the rules do not apply equally
Related
- The conservative ideal encompasses what is best about conservatism, and ways in which the idea of conservatism is misrepresented or misused.
- Conservatives tend to be on the political right wing.
Conservatism encompasses a wide variety of possible viewpoints, with different aspects being emphasized in different countries:
- US conservatism
- RationalWiki has a good run-down of what "conservative" means in a number of different countries.
Social Conservatism
Social conservatives believe that there is "wisdom embedded in [existing] social structures/norms", and that we tamper with those structures at our peril. In other words, the current social norms are the way they are because they have been proven to work over a long period of time, and there is considerable danger if they cease to work properly.
The implication of this is that we don't know how those norms got the way they are, nor why they work. This is at odds with the idea that we as a civilization have been documenting our own history in considerable detail for many centuries now, and are indeed quite capable of noting which experiments have succeeded, which failed, and which were made popular or unpopular without correlation to (and for reasons other than) their success or failure at their intended purpose. The social conservative attitude essentially favors custom over understanding, shuns experimentation, and fears the possible consequences.
Social conservatives are at odds with social liberals on certain issues:
- marriage (liberals want to broaden it, conservatives don't)
- death penalty (conservatives for, liberals against)
- gun control (conservatives against, liberals for)
Fiscal Conservatism
Fiscal conservatives are more concerned about unnecessary government expenditure, and tend to prefer solutions where private industry or "faith-based" groups provide the bulk of the funding. For this reason, they tend to seek solutions based in free market incentives. They also tend to be against government regulation, however, which they unfortunately often seem to forget is a requirement for a free marketplace.
Quotes
[ Rudyard Kipling ] was a conservative in the sense that he believed civilization to be something laboriously achieved which was only precariously defended. He wanted to see the defences fully manned and he hated the liberals because he thought them gullible and feeble, believing in the easy perfectibility of man and ready to abandon the work of centuries for sentimental qualms.
Links
Reference
- Wikipedia
- Conservapedia
dKosopediano equivalent article (as of 2008-03-27); see search- SourceWatch
- RationalWiki (redirects to Conservative)
Orgs (non-US)
- Christian Voice (UK)