Difference between revisions of "2025/01/29/plane-helicopter collision"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{c/date}} category:accident ==About== At 8:47 p.m., a commercial passenger plane from Wichita collided with a US Army helicopter. No survivors have been f...")
 
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* The helicopter was a UH-60 Black Hawk, flying down the Potomac on a training mission.
 
* The helicopter was a UH-60 Black Hawk, flying down the Potomac on a training mission.
 
** There were 3 soldiers on board.
 
** There were 3 soldiers on board.
 +
==Related==
 +
* [[Donald Trump/claims/DC plane crash]]
 +
==Lawsuit==
 +
Right-aligned news sources are connecting the accident with [[Brigida v. United States Department of Transportation]], a discrimination lawsuit brought against the {{FAA}} in 2015 and elevated to class action status in 2022. The only way there can be a connection is if non-CCWM (cis Christian white male) candidates would have had to be hired instead of more qualified CCWM candidates – and that was never what DEI practices specified. Tentatively, the facts of the matter do not seem to point in this direction.
 
{{links/smw}}
 
{{links/smw}}

Latest revision as of 13:48, 2 February 2025

About

At 8:47 p.m., a commercial passenger plane from Wichita collided with a US Army helicopter. No survivors have been found. The collision took place a few hundred feet above the water.

  • The passenger aircraft, American Eagle Flight 5342, was a Bombardier CRJ700 regional jet operated by American Airlines subsidiary PSA Airlines.
    • The flight was set to land in Washington at 8:57 p.m.
    • There were 60 passengers and 4 crew.
  • The helicopter was a UH-60 Black Hawk, flying down the Potomac on a training mission.
    • There were 3 soldiers on board.

Related

Lawsuit

Right-aligned news sources are connecting the accident with Brigida v. United States Department of Transportation, a discrimination lawsuit brought against the FAA in 2015 and elevated to class action status in 2022. The only way there can be a connection is if non-CCWM (cis Christian white male) candidates would have had to be hired instead of more qualified CCWM candidates – and that was never what DEI practices specified. Tentatively, the facts of the matter do not seem to point in this direction.

News