Difference between revisions of "Bush-Cheney administration/anti-science"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Overview: attempt to update verb tenses post-Bush)
m (Carmona link has now been filed)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
==Related Pages==
 
==Related Pages==
* [[Reality-based thinking]], a concept which is apparently opposed by the Bush administration (and also vital for good [[science]])
+
* The administration often appeared to oppose [[reality-based thinking]], a concept which is vital for good [[science]]
* The Bush administration is certainly not alone in being [[anti-science]].
+
* The forces of [[anti-science]] in general enjoyed a dramatic resurgence during this administration.
 +
 
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
===Filed Links===
 
===Filed Links===
 
{{links.tagged}}
 
{{links.tagged}}
 
===News & Views===
 
===News & Views===
* '''2007-07-10''' [[2007-07-10 White House Is Accused of Putting Politics Over Science]]: "Former Surgeon General [[Richard H. Carmona]] told a Congressional committee today that top officials in the [[Bush II administration|Bush administration]] repeatedly tried to weaken or suppress important public health reports because of political considerations."
 
 
* '''2007-03-23''' [http://www.miamiherald.com/285/story/50043.html Faking science? Bush team must think we're stupid] by Leonard Pitts, Jr.: names several examples of prior offenses
 
* '''2007-03-23''' [http://www.miamiherald.com/285/story/50043.html Faking science? Bush team must think we're stupid] by Leonard Pitts, Jr.: names several examples of prior offenses
 
* '''2006-11-28''' [http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=801 How Old Is the Grand Canyon? Park Service Won't Say]: "Orders to Cater to Creationists Makes National Park Agnostic on Geology"
 
* '''2006-11-28''' [http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=801 How Old Is the Grand Canyon? Park Service Won't Say]: "Orders to Cater to Creationists Makes National Park Agnostic on Geology"

Latest revision as of 13:52, 11 September 2010

Overview

The Bush-Cheney administration clamed to be pro-science, and often made gestures to that effect, but generally acted on a deeply anti-scientific agenda – of which their support of evangelism was just a facet. (Even their outward support of evangelism was more of a tool towards political ends than a reflection of actual beliefs by anyone in the administration.)

Bush himself went on record in support of intelligent design, an anti-scientific theory thinly clothed in scientific terminology.

This contradictory stance is also part of a consistent pattern of hypocrisy within the administration.

Related Pages

  • The administration often appeared to oppose reality-based thinking, a concept which is vital for good science
  • The forces of anti-science in general enjoyed a dramatic resurgence during this administration.

Links

Filed Links

  1. redirect template:links/smw

News & Views