Difference between revisions of "Liberal media bias"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Links: rightfromtheright blog)
(update; smw)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
+
<hide>
The idea of [[liberal media bias]], i.e. that there is a strong [[liberal]] skewing of the mainstream media (especially in the {{USA}}, where this is actually less true than in [[Europe]]), seems to be very popular in certain circles of a predominantly [[neoconservative]] flavor. (Presumably it goes without saying that the newer media, such as blogs and [[Wikipedia]], are hopelessly mired in their liberal roots &ndash; except for those explicitly declared to be of a conservative bent.)
+
[[page type::article]]
 +
[[thing type::phrase]]
 +
[[thing type::claim]]
 +
[[category:phrases]]
 +
</hide>
 +
==About==
 +
The idea of [[liberal media bias]], i.e. that the mainstream media (especially in the {{USA}}, where this is actually less true than in [[Europe]]) displays a strong [[bias]] towards [[liberal]] interpretations of the available evidence, is a popular claim on the [[political right|Right]]. (Presumably it goes without saying that the newer media, such as blogs and [[Wikipedia]], are hopelessly mired in their liberal roots &ndash; except for those explicitly declared to be of a conservative bent in order to counter this disturbing trend towards liberalism.)
  
This claimed bias is then used to effectively discredit any information which the neoconservative establishment wants [[suppression of dissent|suppressed]] without actually having to rationally argue against the validity of that information.
+
This claimed bias is then used to effectively discredit any information which the right-wing establishment wishes to dismiss without actually having to rationally argue against it.
 +
===Terminology===
 +
* '''Also known as''': liberal media conspiracy, liberal media elite
 +
* '''Related''': "Liberal media bias" is a subset of the more general claim of [[liberal bias]].
 +
===Conclusions===
 +
Since [[freedom of speech]] (which includes [[freedom of the press]]) is a [[liberal]] concept, it would make sense if news media (whose ability to function properly) tended to favor liberal ideology.
  
'''also known as''': liberal media conspiracy, liberal media elite
+
In reality, however, most of the [[mainstream media]] is now [[media consolidation|owned by a very few companies]] whose aims seem to be [[authoritarian]] and [[plutocrat]]ic, so in practice today's media tend to display a distinct right-wing bias.
===Conclusions===
 
Since [[freedom of the press]] is a [[liberal]] concept, it would seem inevitable that independent media (who depend upon that principle for their livelihood) would tend to favor liberal ideology.
 
  
What is not clear is the reason why anyone, much less [[conservative (US)|conservative]]s, would feel this is bad for America, as America itself was founded on this and other liberal concepts ([[democracy]], [[freedom of speech]], [[freedom of religion]], etc.). The obvious conclusion to draw is that those who see liberal media bias as a bad thing are in favor of increasing [[media consolidation]] and may even be working for one of the arms of the [[global media empire]], directly or indirectly.
+
Even if the media were, in fact, biased towards liberal ideas, it's not clear why anyone, much less [[conservative (US)|conservative]]s, would feel this is bad for America, as America itself was founded on this and other [[enlightenment|enlightened]] liberal concepts ([[democracy]], [[freedom of speech]], [[freedom of religion]], etc.). The obvious conclusion to draw is that those who wield claims of "liberal media bias" as a form of attack don't really understand what they are saying, and are simply using it as a [[soldier argument]] or [[tribal identity marker]].
 
==Related Pages==
 
==Related Pages==
* The phrase "[[left gatekeepers]]" refers to those in positions of respect or [[authority]] within the [[political left]] who feel it necessary to maintain that respectability by carefully avoiding or even repudiating any viewpoints which the [[political right]] has deemed "too radical".
+
* The phrase "[[left gatekeepers]]" refers to those in positions of respect or [[authority]] within the [[political left]] who feel it necessary to maintain their establishment connections (and hence their exclusive access to powerful establishment figures) by carefully avoiding or even repudiating any viewpoints which the right-leaning establishment has deemed "too radical".
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===
* [[Conservapedia]]: [[conservapedia:Media bias|Media bias]] | [[conservapedia:Liberal Bias|Liberal Bias]]
+
* [[Conservapedia]]: {{l/cp|Media bias}} | {{l/cp|Liberal bias}}
 
===Blogs===
 
===Blogs===
 
* [http://rightfromtheright.blogspot.com/ Right from the Right] "Created to give example after example of media bias, left wing lies, and the [[political correctness|PC]] world."
 
* [http://rightfromtheright.blogspot.com/ Right from the Right] "Created to give example after example of media bias, left wing lies, and the [[political correctness|PC]] world."

Revision as of 20:54, 25 January 2015

About

The idea of liberal media bias, i.e. that the mainstream media (especially in the United States, where this is actually less true than in Europe) displays a strong bias towards liberal interpretations of the available evidence, is a popular claim on the Right. (Presumably it goes without saying that the newer media, such as blogs and Wikipedia, are hopelessly mired in their liberal roots – except for those explicitly declared to be of a conservative bent in order to counter this disturbing trend towards liberalism.)

This claimed bias is then used to effectively discredit any information which the right-wing establishment wishes to dismiss without actually having to rationally argue against it.

Terminology

  • Also known as: liberal media conspiracy, liberal media elite
  • Related: "Liberal media bias" is a subset of the more general claim of liberal bias.

Conclusions

Since freedom of speech (which includes freedom of the press) is a liberal concept, it would make sense if news media (whose ability to function properly) tended to favor liberal ideology.

In reality, however, most of the mainstream media is now owned by a very few companies whose aims seem to be authoritarian and plutocratic, so in practice today's media tend to display a distinct right-wing bias.

Even if the media were, in fact, biased towards liberal ideas, it's not clear why anyone, much less conservatives, would feel this is bad for America, as America itself was founded on this and other enlightened liberal concepts (democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc.). The obvious conclusion to draw is that those who wield claims of "liberal media bias" as a form of attack don't really understand what they are saying, and are simply using it as a soldier argument or tribal identity marker.

Related Pages

  • The phrase "left gatekeepers" refers to those in positions of respect or authority within the political left who feel it necessary to maintain their establishment connections (and hence their exclusive access to powerful establishment figures) by carefully avoiding or even repudiating any viewpoints which the right-leaning establishment has deemed "too radical".

Links

Reference

Blogs