Difference between revisions of "Association fallacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(overview section; standard sources; filed links) |
(→Overview: is a form of reasoning by reputation) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| − | [[category:logical fallacies]]An [[association fallacy]] is a type of [[logical fallacy]] which asserts (or implies) that qualities of one are inherently qualities of another, merely by association. The two types are sometimes referred to as "guilt by association" and "honor by association." | + | [[category:logical fallacies]]An [[association fallacy]] is a type of [[logical fallacy]] which asserts (or implies) that qualities of one are inherently qualities of another, merely by association. The two types are sometimes referred to as "guilt by association" and "honor by association." |
| + | |||
| + | The association fallacy is a special case of [[red herring]], and is often based in an [[appeal to emotion]]. {{wpref|Association fallacy}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The association fallacy is also a form of [[reasoning by reputation]] when it is applied to personal reputations. | ||
| + | |||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
Revision as of 01:20, 25 June 2008
Overview
An association fallacy is a type of logical fallacy which asserts (or implies) that qualities of one are inherently qualities of another, merely by association. The two types are sometimes referred to as "guilt by association" and "honor by association."
The association fallacy is a special case of red herring, and is often based in an appeal to emotion. [W]
The association fallacy is also a form of reasoning by reputation when it is applied to personal reputations.
Links
Reference
- Wikipedia
- Conservapedia
(Guilt by Association) dKosopediano equivalent article (as of 2008-05-06)SourceWatchno equivalent article (as of 2008-05-06); see Transfer
Filed Links
- redirect template:links/smw