Difference between revisions of "Moral system"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 92.5.234.79 (talk) to last revision by Woozle)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Given the existence of those situations, it may also be useful is to attempt to determine:
 
Given the existence of those situations, it may also be useful is to attempt to determine:
 
* meta-rules by which people with different moral systems can get along.
 
* meta-rules by which people with different moral systems can get along.
* where the basic differences lie between moral systems (e.g. if two people disagree about some immediate issue, such as "the death penalty", what are the basic irreducible principles upon which each person is basing their point of view?) towards the end of devising me
+
* where the basic differences lie between moral systems (e.g. if two people disagree about some immediate issue, such as "the death penalty", what are the basic irreducible principles upon which each person is basing their point of view?) towards the end of devising meta-rules (see above) which might work across those differences
 
 
 
==Value Dichotomies==
 
==Value Dichotomies==
 
Most moral systems weigh in somewhere between the two extremes for each of these, but the differences in opinion between one system and another are significant. The following principles may or may not be truly basic, but they at least are closer to being ''principles'' than they are opinions about specific issues.
 
Most moral systems weigh in somewhere between the two extremes for each of these, but the differences in opinion between one system and another are significant. The following principles may or may not be truly basic, but they at least are closer to being ''principles'' than they are opinions about specific issues.

Revision as of 18:10, 6 July 2011

Overview

A moral system a particular set of ethical values which can be used to decide the rightness or wrongness of an act.

Related Ideas

Purpose

While it may be possible to debate the utility of various moral systems -- i.e. how well they succeed at minimizing harm -- in many situations such discussion may not be possible due to individuals who believe that their particular moral system is axiomatic, based on laws of nature which cannot be revised.

Given the existence of those situations, it may also be useful is to attempt to determine:

  • meta-rules by which people with different moral systems can get along.
  • where the basic differences lie between moral systems (e.g. if two people disagree about some immediate issue, such as "the death penalty", what are the basic irreducible principles upon which each person is basing their point of view?) towards the end of devising meta-rules (see above) which might work across those differences

Value Dichotomies

Most moral systems weigh in somewhere between the two extremes for each of these, but the differences in opinion between one system and another are significant. The following principles may or may not be truly basic, but they at least are closer to being principles than they are opinions about specific issues.

  • Human nature is essentially: good or evil (not quite the same as Hobbes vs. Rousseau; see below)
  • Human nature comes from: genetics and other factors fixed at birth ("nature") vs. training and learning after birth ("nurture")
  • Property rights: personal property is sacrosanct (propertarianism) vs. all property should be held in common
  • Power: absolutism (Hobbes: "abuses of power by [legitimate] authority are to be accepted as the price of peace") vs. separation of powers and social contracts (Rousseau). This may be a restatement of Brin's question "To what degree should the state or party have to power to coerce cooperation?", or it may be subtly different.

Related Articles