Difference between revisions of "Google+"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Reference: Skud explains G+ names policy)
(moved naming policy stuff to subpages)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
===Pages===
 
===Pages===
 
* [[/suspensions]]: list of users whose accounts have been suspended due to ostensible naming policy violations
 
* [[/suspensions]]: list of users whose accounts have been suspended due to ostensible naming policy violations
===Pseudonym Dispute===
+
* [[/policy]]
G+'s [http://www.google.com/intl/en/+/policy/content.html policy] of requiring users to use only "the name your friends, family or co-workers usually call you" has been the source of a large number of user complaints for the following reasons:
+
** [[/policy/naming|/naming]]: the infamous "common name" policy, and the controversy regarding it
* Google's enforcement of this policy has been somewhat arbitrary.
 
* Google's enforcement of this policy has not always been consistent with the policy as written. The policy says you can use a name that people "usually call you", but enforcers seem to be interpreting this to mean "legal name (or variant thereof)"... unless that name sounds too unusual (to their ears) to be a "real" name.
 
* Towards enforcement of the policy on G+, Google often cut users off from access to all other Google services such as [[Gmail]].
 
* There does not appear to be a formal appeal process after having your account (either G+ or Google in general) disabled.
 
* Many users are known better by their online handles than by their legal names.
 
* Many users have valid reasons not to use their legal names in public or semi-public spaces online, ranging from personal protection to aesthetic preference.
 
* It is not clear what the purpose of this policy is, as Google's explanations so far have not correlated with reality.
 
** One explanation Google has offered is that they want to make it easier for people to find each other by name. However, in some cases an alias works better for this, e.g. an author known mainly by her pen-name, or a user with a very common legal name who prefers to go by her unusual alias ''because'' it is more recognizable and unique than her legal name.
 
 
==Staff==
 
==Staff==
 
''as of 2011-08-03''
 
''as of 2011-08-03''
Line 29: Line 21:
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
===Official===
 
===Official===
* [http://www.google.com/intl/en/+/policy/content.html User Content and Conduct Policy]
+
* [[URL::https://plus.google.com|service home page]]
* [http://www.google.com/accounts/TOS?hl=en&loc=US Google Terms of Service]
 
* [http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=107107 Community standards]
 
* [http://www.google.com/support/+/bin/answer.py?answer=1228271 Your name and Google Profiles]
 
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===
 
* {{wikipedia}}
 
* {{wikipedia}}
 
* [http://www.recommendedusers.com/ unofficial Google+ Recommended Users lists]
 
* [http://www.recommendedusers.com/ unofficial Google+ Recommended Users lists]
* '''2011-08-04''' [[URL/to file::http://infotrope.net/2011/08/04/google-plus-names-policy-explained/|Google+ names policy, explained]]
 
 
{{links/smw}}
 
{{links/smw}}

Revision as of 13:35, 14 August 2011

About

Google+ (pronounced Google Plus and often written as "G+") is a social networking service created and operated by Google. It was in beta (and invitation-only) for much of July, but as of 2011-07-31 the home page and sign-in page showed no signs of any restriction, agreeing with a rumored July 31 release date.

Pages

  • /suspensions: list of users whose accounts have been suspended due to ostensible naming policy violations
  • /policy
    • /naming: the infamous "common name" policy, and the controversy regarding it

Staff

as of 2011-08-03

Links

Official

Reference

Related

  • 2014/06/09 [L..T] Thanks for nothing, jerkface "In case you missed it, Google CEO Sergey Brin publicly admitted last week that Google+ was "a mistake" for him – one month after the man he hired to run the social network, Vic Gundotra, left the company without explanation."
  • 2011/07/27 [L..T] Why it Matters: Google+ and Diversity Just a few days before Google+'s doors officially open on July 31, Google's latest communications from Vic (via Robert) and Bradley on the raft of account suspensions and “common names” policy seem unlikely to put the “identity crisis” to rest. It's certainly a positive sign that they're engaging, and process changes like giving people with names Google doesn't like a week to change their account name before suspending them are certainly improvements. That said, the impression they're giving is that they're going to try to hold the line with the current policy even knowing that it targets transgender people, human rights activists, people at risk for stalking and harrassment domestic violence survivors, HIV/AIDS victims and caregivers, people with names that sound weird to Americans (or for that matter people in Hong Kong who would rather go by their English names)..."
  • 2011/07/26 [L..T] Fraudsters Already Exploiting Google+ It was inevitable. With the creation of Google+, a new social network already boasting over 20 million users, the scammers were sure to follow. Here's a note a probable fraudster sent to reader Geoff through his Google+ profile, informing him that someone died in Africa and he needs to be contacted about a "business transaction" of "magnitude."
  • 2011/07/03 [L..T] Google made my son cry