Difference between revisions of "Operation Fast and Furious/2012/09/21/HF"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<hide> {{subpage}} {{datecat|2012-09-21}} </hide> * '''URL''': [[URL::http://blog.heritage.org/2012/09/21/morning-bell-5-ways-fast-furious-tarnishes-eric-holders-justice-depar...") |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* '''Title''': [[Title::5 Ways Fast & Furious Tarnishes Eric Holder's Justice Department]] | * '''Title''': [[Title::5 Ways Fast & Furious Tarnishes Eric Holder's Justice Department]] | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | On {{date|2012-09-21}}, the [[Heritage Foundation]], an [[ | + | On {{date|2012-09-21}}, the [[Heritage Foundation]], an [[conservatism/US/org|US conservatist think-tank]], issued a statement regarding the {{l/sub|pfx=Operation Fast and Furious/|Horowitz report}} on [[Operation Fast and Furious]]. Their primary findings were: |
# The report singles out top Department of Justice officials for wrongdoing. | # The report singles out top Department of Justice officials for wrongdoing. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:19, 12 October 2022
- URL: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/09/21/morning-bell-5-ways-fast-furious-tarnishes-eric-holders-justice-department-2/
- Title: 5 Ways Fast & Furious Tarnishes Eric Holder's Justice Department
About
On 2012-09-21, the Heritage Foundation, an US conservatist think-tank, issued a statement regarding the Horowitz report on Operation Fast and Furious. Their primary findings were:
- The report singles out top Department of Justice officials for wrongdoing.
- The report appears to contradict sworn testimony by Attorney General Eric Holder.
- The report faults top Justice Department leadership with failing to adequately respond to the murder of an American border patrol agent.
- The White House refused to disclose any internal communications to the inspector general.
- The report fails to consider evidence that a top DOJ official knew the department misled Congress.
The only point on which HF argues that the report itself is negligent is item #5; HF does not appear to give any credence to the gun-control theory.