Difference between revisions of "Fallacy of moderation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I Drew This: sensible centrism) |
(→Humor: quotes: Kevin Barrett) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Humor== | ==Humor== | ||
* '''2007-08-15''' [http://www.idrewthis.org/2007/08/i-drew-this-august-15-2007.html I Drew This]: being a sensible centrist | * '''2007-08-15''' [http://www.idrewthis.org/2007/08/i-drew-this-august-15-2007.html I Drew This]: being a sensible centrist | ||
| + | ==Quotes== | ||
| + | {{excerpt|Dr. [[Kevin Barrett]] [http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2008/01/02/02073.html said]:}} | ||
| + | In court, for example, [[psychopath]]s can tell extreme bald-faced lies in a plausible manner, while their sane opponents are handicapped by an emotional predisposition to remain within hailing distance of the [[truth]]. Too often, the judge or jury imagines that the truth must be somewhere in the middle, and then issues decisions that benefit the psychopath. | ||
| + | {{-excerpt}} | ||
Revision as of 13:01, 16 January 2008
The fallacy of moderation is a logical fallacy which occurs when one assumes that the truth must lie approximately halfway between two opposing opinions. It is also known as False Compromise and The Golden Mean Fallacy.
The fallacy of moderation is related to the technique of Moving the Fulcrum and the Overton window concept in political theory [W].
Reference
- False compromise at Wikipedia
- The Nizkor Project:
- Fallacy: Middle Ground
- False Compromise (single paragraph)
Humor
- 2007-08-15 I Drew This: being a sensible centrist
Quotes
| Dr. Kevin Barrett said: |
|
In court, for example, psychopaths can tell extreme bald-faced lies in a plausible manner, while their sane opponents are handicapped by an emotional predisposition to remain within hailing distance of the truth. Too often, the judge or jury imagines that the truth must be somewhere in the middle, and then issues decisions that benefit the psychopath. |