Jamesgmartin.center/2025/04/how-to-judge-a-basic-research-proposal
Revision as of 01:41, 4 April 2025 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{page/link/v4}} * '''source''': source::James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal * '''author''': author::John Staddon")
|
How to Judge a Basic-Research Proposal 2025/04/02 04:00
|
- URL: https://jamesgmartin.center/2025/04/how-to-judge-a-basic-research-proposal/
- Posted: 2025-04-02T04:00:14+00:00 (date: 2025/04/02)
- Topics: scientific research science
- Summary: «The reasons for this distrust are many: fraud [...]; thousands of retracted papers (most justified, some not); massive failure to replicate studies; and weak experimental and analytic methods. Not to mention the authoritarian failure of the medical-science establishment over the Covid epidemic.» ... «Among the causes of these problems are bad incentives on campus and elsewhere, a system that encourages careerism over love of knowledge, and epistemologically irrelevant race-and-sex policies (aka DEI). Another problem, however, is how basic science is funded.»
- source: James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal
- author: John Staddon