Difference between revisions of "2010-06-04 No mosque at Ground Zero"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (topic update (forgot)) |
m (fixed stuff) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* '''topics''': [[topic::Ground Zero Mosque]] [[topic::Islamic cultural invasion/US]] | * '''topics''': [[topic::Ground Zero Mosque]] [[topic::Islamic cultural invasion/US]] | ||
* '''title''': [[title::No mosque at Ground Zero]] | * '''title''': [[title::No mosque at Ground Zero]] | ||
− | * '''summary''': | + | * '''keywords''': [[medium::video]] |
+ | * '''summary''': [[Summary::[[Pat Condell]] throws his lot in with the US right-wing media on the issue of the [[Ground Zero Mosque]], warning that it is the first major step towards the [[Islamic cultural invasion/US|Islamic cultural invasion of America]].]] | ||
His arguments seem largely based on right-wing [[interpretive framing|framing]], and he makes no mention of key facts in the matter, such as the fact that nobody's rights are being violated and that it would indeed be a violation of the mosque-owners' rights if they were prohibited from building or operating as they see fit within the law. | His arguments seem largely based on right-wing [[interpretive framing|framing]], and he makes no mention of key facts in the matter, such as the fact that nobody's rights are being violated and that it would indeed be a violation of the mosque-owners' rights if they were prohibited from building or operating as they see fit within the law. | ||
{{page/link/footer}} | {{page/link/footer}} |
Latest revision as of 16:34, 24 August 2020
- link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjS0Novt3X4
- when: 2010-06-04
- author: Pat Condell
- source: YouTube
- topics: Ground Zero Mosque Islamic cultural invasion/US
- title: No mosque at Ground Zero
- keywords: video
- summary: Pat Condell throws his lot in with the US right-wing media on the issue of the Ground Zero Mosque, warning that it is the first major step towards the Islamic cultural invasion of America.
His arguments seem largely based on right-wing framing, and he makes no mention of key facts in the matter, such as the fact that nobody's rights are being violated and that it would indeed be a violation of the mosque-owners' rights if they were prohibited from building or operating as they see fit within the law.