Difference between revisions of "2014/07/22/Appeals court swings a sledgehammer at the ACA"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(new page from form at http://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Forms/v3/news/entry) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* '''link''': [[URL::http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/appeals-court-swings-sledgehammer-the-aca]] | * '''link''': [[URL::http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/appeals-court-swings-sledgehammer-the-aca]] | ||
* '''title''': [[title::Appeals court swings a sledgehammer at the ACA]] | * '''title''': [[title::Appeals court swings a sledgehammer at the ACA]] | ||
| − | * '''summary''': | + | * '''summary''': [[Summary::{{fmt/quote|There's one last court case that we've been following that, in theory, could still destroy much of [[Obamacare|the federal health care system]]. At a distance, it's a genuinely ridiculous case, but as [http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/dc-circuit-obamacare-subsidies Adam Serwer reports] this morning, its absurdity didn't stop Republican-appointed judges from making the wrong call this morning.}}]] |
{{page/link/footer}} | {{page/link/footer}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:53, 29 March 2022
- when: 2014/07/22
- author: Steve Benen
- source: MSNBC MaddowBlog
- topics: Obamacare court decision
- keywords
- link: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/appeals-court-swings-sledgehammer-the-aca
- title: Appeals court swings a sledgehammer at the ACA
- summary: «There's one last court case that we've been following that, in theory, could still destroy much of the federal health care system. At a distance, it's a genuinely ridiculous case, but as Adam Serwer reports this morning, its absurdity didn't stop Republican-appointed judges from making the wrong call this morning.»