Difference between revisions of "2015/02/18/The idea of two sexes is simplistic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created by MakePage, submitted from [https://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Forms/v3/news/entry].) |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
</hide> | </hide> | ||
* '''when''': [[when posted::2015/02/18]] | * '''when''': [[when posted::2015/02/18]] | ||
| − | * '''author''': [[author:: | + | * '''author''': [[author::PZ Myers]] |
* '''source''': [[site::Pharyngula]] | * '''source''': [[site::Pharyngula]] | ||
* '''topics''': [[topic::biological sex]] | * '''topics''': [[topic::biological sex]] | ||
Revision as of 00:50, 22 July 2020
- when: 2015/02/18
- author: PZ Myers
- source: Pharyngula
- topics: biological sex
- keywords
- link: https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/02/18/the-idea-of-two-sexes-is-simplistic-biologists-now-think-there-is-a-wider-spectrum-than-that/
- title: “The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that.”
- summary: "...my only quibble would be with that “now”. You’d have to define "now" as a window of time that encompasses the entirety of my training and work in developmental biology, and I’m getting to be kind of an old guy. Differences in sex development (DSDs) are common knowledge, and rather routine – and coincidentally, I’m giving an exam on sex chromosome anomalies today."