Difference between revisions of "Assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/wpath-experts-rebuke-nyt-on-puberty-blockers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{page/link/v4}} ==Commentary== * '''2022-11-25''' [https://journa.host/@e_urq/109404495005109766 Evan Urquhart on journa.host] notes that {{fmt/quote|(WPATH's process for...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 16:57, 25 November 2022
|
WPATH Experts Rebuke NYT on Puberty Blockers 2022/11/25 00:00
|
- URL: https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/wpath-experts-rebuke-nyt-on-puberty-blockers
- Posted: 2022-11-25
- Topics: WPATH puberty blockers Nytimes.com/2022/11/14/health/puberty-blockers-transgender Assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/nyt-investigation-finds-concerns-about-puberty-blockers-for-trans-youth
- Summary: «On November 22 the medical organization responsible for setting standards for providers of gender affirming care, WPATH, released a statement in response to the terrible New York Times piece on puberty blockers. Saying that the Times piece “furthers the atmosphere of misinformation and subjectivity,” WPATH did not mince words, condemning the use of sources unfamiliar with transgender medicine as well as some of the methods undertaken by the Times reporters.»
Commentary
- 2022-11-25 Evan Urquhart on journa.host notes that «(WPATH's process for determining standards of care was the subject of another NYT article by Emily Bazelon, not long ago. It is a very mainstream organization, often criticized for its conservatism by trans people.)»