Difference between revisions of "Intelligent design/objections"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Analyses: talkorigins)
m (→‎Links: Kitzmiller vs. Dover)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
* [http://www.talkorigins.org/ Talk.Origins newsgroup archive]: mostly "exploring the creation/evolution controversy"
 
* [http://www.talkorigins.org/ Talk.Origins newsgroup archive]: mostly "exploring the creation/evolution controversy"
 +
** [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover.html Kitzmiller vs. Dover]: transcription of the much-discussed "Pennsylvania Intelligent Design Case"

Revision as of 18:32, 23 January 2006

Intelligent Design (ID) is often proposed as a viable alternative to the theory of Evolution. Mainstream scientists generally agree that ID is not a viable theory, but the challenges continue – and many of the arguments advanced by the ID camp are appealing and quite difficult to refute.

Notes

The OSC analysis linked below seems a pretty reasonable treatment of a solution, but it remains to be seen whether it will be accepted by the vast majority of those supporting ID.

Related Articles

Analyses

Links