From Issuepedia
Revision as of 15:56, 15 August 2010 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (hierarchy of disagreement diagram (link))
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Unlike other reference projects, Issuepedia welcomes personal opinion.

However, opinions without good arguments behind them will probably be shredded or at least questioned. Attempts to undermine other debaters by use of logical fallacies and other rhetorical deceptions will be called out.


When arguing against another person's statements:

  • DO address the substance of the argument you are disputing.
  • DO be clear about what you're trying to say.
  • DO take a clear position (rather than just attacking positions stated by others).
  • DO offer arguments for why the other debater's statements are unlikely to be true.
  • DO offer arguments to support what you think is correct.

It generally does not strengthen your position if you:

This is relevant, but I can't get the thumbnail to render properly. Statements higher on this hierarchy generally trump lower ones.

Sourced Information

When disputing the accuracy of a source, or of an argument based upon a fact stated in a source:

  • DON'T simply claim that the source is unreliable.
  • DON'T simply claim that the fact is wrong.
  • DO find other sources which have more accurate information.
  • DO offer corrected information.