Difference between revisions of "2015/04/13/I guess I'm an MRA now"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (fixed outdated fx call)
(link is now filed)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* '''title''': [[title::I guess I'm an MRA now]]
 
* '''title''': [[title::I guess I'm an MRA now]]
 
* '''summary''': [[Summary::First let me point out that the little tweet I chirped out was because the TERFs were flocking <em>to me</em> — I hadn’t barged into one of their conversations, or invited them to explain to me what makes for a <em>real</em> woman, but there they were, in <strong>my space</strong>. So she doesn’t get to complain about me violating boundaries.]]
 
* '''summary''': [[Summary::First let me point out that the little tweet I chirped out was because the TERFs were flocking <em>to me</em> — I hadn’t barged into one of their conversations, or invited them to explain to me what makes for a <em>real</em> woman, but there they were, in <strong>my space</strong>. So she doesn’t get to complain about me violating boundaries.]]
<blockquote>Secondly, I do have a scientific background, and I don’t even know what it means to define "biological male" so absolutely. As I pointed out earlier, [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/02/18/the-idea-of-two-sexes-is-simplistic-biologists-now-think-there-is-a-wider-spectrum-than-that/ <i>Nature</i> published a good article on the scientific consensus on the biology of sex], and comes down soundly on the side of defining it as a spectrum. You want to pretend it’s black and white? Fine. You don’t get to claim scientific standing for your beliefs.
+
<blockquote>Secondly, I do have a scientific background, and I don’t even know what it means to define "biological male" so absolutely. As I pointed out earlier, [[2015/02/18/The idea of two sexes is simplistic|<i>Nature</i> published a good article on the scientific consensus on the biology of sex]], and comes down soundly on the side of defining it as a spectrum. You want to pretend it’s black and white? Fine. You don’t get to claim scientific standing for your beliefs.
  
 
Thirdly, my comeback was brief because I see little point in arguing at length with bigots. She said having two X chromosomes made you female, an X and a Y makes you male, and that’s absolutely it. All I had to to was mention {{l/wp|androgen insensitivity syndrome}} (AIS) to refute that.
 
Thirdly, my comeback was brief because I see little point in arguing at length with bigots. She said having two X chromosomes made you female, an X and a Y makes you male, and that’s absolutely it. All I had to to was mention {{l/wp|androgen insensitivity syndrome}} (AIS) to refute that.
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
{{page/link/footer}}
 
{{page/link/footer}}

Latest revision as of 00:51, 22 July 2020

  • when: 2015/04/13
  • author: PZ Myers
  • source: Pharyngula
  • topics: TERF
  • keywords
  • link: https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/04/13/i-guess-im-an-mra-now/
  • title: I guess I'm an MRA now
  • summary: First let me point out that the little tweet I chirped out was because the TERFs were flocking to me — I hadn’t barged into one of their conversations, or invited them to explain to me what makes for a real woman, but there they were, in my space. So she doesn’t get to complain about me violating boundaries.

Secondly, I do have a scientific background, and I don’t even know what it means to define "biological male" so absolutely. As I pointed out earlier, Nature published a good article on the scientific consensus on the biology of sex, and comes down soundly on the side of defining it as a spectrum. You want to pretend it’s black and white? Fine. You don’t get to claim scientific standing for your beliefs.

Thirdly, my comeback was brief because I see little point in arguing at length with bigots. She said having two X chromosomes made you female, an X and a Y makes you male, and that’s absolutely it. All I had to to was mention androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) to refute that.