Difference between revisions of "Political ideologies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Related Pages: P->p) |
(→News: note about list not displaying correctly) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{portal/politics/ideology}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| − | [[category:catalogs]]This page is intended as a catalog or index of existing [[political ideology|political ideologies]]. | + | [[category:catalogs]]This page is intended as a catalog or index of existing [[political ideology|political ideologies]]. |
| + | ===Usage=== | ||
| + | * [[Political ideology]] currently redirects here; it should eventually be a separate page discussing the concept rather than different examples. | ||
==Related Pages== | ==Related Pages== | ||
| − | * The habit of assuming that all [[political ideologies]] can be simply evaluated as falling somewhere | + | * Belief in a particular [[moral system]] is usually the basis for (or a strong component of) an individual's agreement with a particular [[political ideologies|political ideology]]. |
| + | * The habit of assuming that all [[political ideologies]] can be simply evaluated as falling somewhere along a one-dimensional [[left-right axis|"left-right" axis]] is generally misleading and historically arbitrary. Other [[political ideological axes]] have been proposed, generally using two or more dimensions, and it seems likely that at least four dimensions will be necessary in order to avoid significant [[ideological]] [[conflation]]. | ||
| − | == | + | ==List== |
| − | * | + | * [[collectivism]] |
| + | * [[conservatism]] | ||
| + | ** [[US conservatism]] | ||
| + | * [[fascism]] | ||
| + | * [[liberalism]] | ||
| + | ** [[US liberalism]] | ||
| + | * [[libertarianism]] | ||
| + | * [[republicanism]] | ||
| + | ===Notes=== | ||
| + | ''maybe these should go under [[ideologies]] or [[worldviews]]'' | ||
| + | * [[mysticism]]: intuition important, observation unimportant | ||
| + | * [[nihilism]] could be defined as a very low value assigned to '''human understanding''' (further implying that neither intuition nor reason has much value either) | ||
| + | * [[postmodernism]] | ||
| + | * [[romanticism]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Links== | ||
| + | ===Reference=== | ||
| + | * {{wikipedia|Ideologies of parties}} (Ideologies of parties): a list of political ideologies, broken down by main ideological emphasis | ||
| + | ===News=== | ||
| + | ''Note: things are showing up in this list which shouldn't be there. I have to check the code and figure out what's going on. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 10:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)'' | ||
| + | {{links/news}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:55, 24 September 2009
| Political Ideology Portal |
Overview
This page is intended as a catalog or index of existing political ideologies.
Usage
- Political ideology currently redirects here; it should eventually be a separate page discussing the concept rather than different examples.
Related Pages
- Belief in a particular moral system is usually the basis for (or a strong component of) an individual's agreement with a particular political ideology.
- The habit of assuming that all political ideologies can be simply evaluated as falling somewhere along a one-dimensional "left-right" axis is generally misleading and historically arbitrary. Other political ideological axes have been proposed, generally using two or more dimensions, and it seems likely that at least four dimensions will be necessary in order to avoid significant ideological conflation.
List
Notes
maybe these should go under ideologies or worldviews
- mysticism: intuition important, observation unimportant
- nihilism could be defined as a very low value assigned to human understanding (further implying that neither intuition nor reason has much value either)
- postmodernism
- romanticism
Links
Reference
- Wikipedia (Ideologies of parties): a list of political ideologies, broken down by main ideological emphasis
News
Note: things are showing up in this list which shouldn't be there. I have to check the code and figure out what's going on. --Woozle 10:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)