Difference between revisions of "2004/07/30/Sex changes are not effective"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* '''link''': [[URL::https://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/jul/30/health.mentalhealth]] | * '''link''': [[URL::https://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/jul/30/health.mentalhealth]] | ||
* '''title''': [[title::Sex changes are not effective, say researchers ]] | * '''title''': [[title::Sex changes are not effective, say researchers ]] | ||
| − | * '''summary''': [[Summary::“There is no conclusive evidence that sex change operations improve the lives of transsexuals, with many people remaining severely distressed and even suicidal after the operation, according to a medical review conducted exclusively for Guardian Weekend tomorrow.”]] | + | * '''summary''': [[Summary::“There is no conclusive evidence that sex change operations improve the lives of transsexuals, with many people remaining severely distressed and even suicidal after the operation, according to a medical review conducted exclusively for Guardian Weekend tomorrow.” This is article [[sex reassignment surgery/misrepresentation|misleadingly represents]] what is known about the effects of SRS.]] |
This is a misleading article. The essential points for understanding why it is misleading: | This is a misleading article. The essential points for understanding why it is misleading: | ||
* The study in question involved a review of ''only'' [[double-blind]] trials involving [[sex reassignment surgery]] (SRS) | * The study in question involved a review of ''only'' [[double-blind]] trials involving [[sex reassignment surgery]] (SRS) | ||
Revision as of 13:52, 21 June 2020
- when: 2004/07/30
- author: David Batty
- source: The Guardian
- topics: sex reassignment surgery/misrepresentation
- keywords
- link: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/jul/30/health.mentalhealth
- title: Sex changes are not effective, say researchers
- summary: “There is no conclusive evidence that sex change operations improve the lives of transsexuals, with many people remaining severely distressed and even suicidal after the operation, according to a medical review conducted exclusively for Guardian Weekend tomorrow.” This is article misleadingly represents what is known about the effects of SRS.
This is a misleading article. The essential points for understanding why it is misleading:
- The study in question involved a review of only double-blind trials involving sex reassignment surgery (SRS)
- It is not possible to ethically conduct double-blind SRS studies, for multiple reasons...
- There is no placebo for SRS; the patient will always know whether they've had it or not.
- Simply withholding treatment from half the patients leads to high suicide rates in those patients
- ...therefore none have been conducted.
- Therefore there will never be evidence which satisfies this criterion.
- There are reasonable ways to study the question scientifically, however:
- long-term study: measure the quality of life of SRS recipients before and after surgery
- demographic-corrected: measure the quality of life of SRS recipients after surgery and compare them to the average quality of life of transsexuals before surgery
- self-evaluation: ask transsexuals after surgery whether they feel better
Analyses:
- 2014-08-02 A commentary on the 2004 ARIF study and the Guardian article "Sex changes are not effective, say researchers" (major source for the above analysis)