Difference between revisions of "2011/07/30/1606/link"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(to -> on (oops)) |
m (topic) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* '''when''': [[when posted::2005/02/15]] | * '''when''': [[when posted::2005/02/15]] | ||
* '''responds to''': [[comments on::2011/07/30/0948/link]] | * '''responds to''': [[comments on::2011/07/30/0948/link]] | ||
| + | * '''topics''': [[topic::9-11/anomalies/straw men]] | ||
* '''summary''': [[summary::lead paragraph::The March 2005 issue of ''Popular Mechanics'' magazine contains a 14-full-page cover article which attacks skepticism about the government and media explanation of the 9/11/01 attack. The primary method of the piece is to build and attack a straw man of myths it claims are "at the root of virtually every 9/11 alternative scenario" embraced by the "growing army of conspiracy theorists." PM selects a combination of 16 valid, erroneous, and inconsequential claims found on websites, implying that they are all endorsed by the "army" of skeptics.]] | * '''summary''': [[summary::lead paragraph::The March 2005 issue of ''Popular Mechanics'' magazine contains a 14-full-page cover article which attacks skepticism about the government and media explanation of the 9/11/01 attack. The primary method of the piece is to build and attack a straw man of myths it claims are "at the root of virtually every 9/11 alternative scenario" embraced by the "growing army of conspiracy theorists." PM selects a combination of 16 valid, erroneous, and inconsequential claims found on websites, implying that they are all endorsed by the "army" of skeptics.]] | ||
{{page/link/footer}} | {{page/link/footer}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:37, 20 March 2013
- link: http://911review.com/pm/markup/
- title: Popular Mechanics' Deceptive Smear Against 9/11 Truth
- source: 911review.com
- author: Jim Hoffman
- when: 2005/02/15
- responds to: 2011/07/30/0948/link
- topics: 9-11/anomalies/straw men
- summary: lead paragraph::The March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics magazine contains a 14-full-page cover article which attacks skepticism about the government and media explanation of the 9/11/01 attack. The primary method of the piece is to build and attack a straw man of myths it claims are "at the root of virtually every 9/11 alternative scenario" embraced by the "growing army of conspiracy theorists." PM selects a combination of 16 valid, erroneous, and inconsequential claims found on websites, implying that they are all endorsed by the "army" of skeptics.