Difference between revisions of "2015/04/13/I guess I'm an MRA now"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created by MakePage, submitted from [https://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Forms/v3/news/entry].) |
m (fixed outdated fx call) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
{{page/link|article}} | {{page/link|article}} | ||
| − | [[title/short::I guess | + | [[title/short::I guess I'm an MRA now]] |
</hide> | </hide> | ||
* '''when''': [[when posted::2015/04/13]] | * '''when''': [[when posted::2015/04/13]] | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* '''keywords''' | * '''keywords''' | ||
* '''link''': [[URL::https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/04/13/i-guess-im-an-mra-now/]] | * '''link''': [[URL::https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/04/13/i-guess-im-an-mra-now/]] | ||
| − | * '''title''': [[title::I guess | + | * '''title''': [[title::I guess I'm an MRA now]] |
| − | * '''summary''': | + | * '''summary''': [[Summary::First let me point out that the little tweet I chirped out was because the TERFs were flocking <em>to me</em> — I hadn’t barged into one of their conversations, or invited them to explain to me what makes for a <em>real</em> woman, but there they were, in <strong>my space</strong>. So she doesn’t get to complain about me violating boundaries.]] |
<blockquote>Secondly, I do have a scientific background, and I don’t even know what it means to define "biological male" so absolutely. As I pointed out earlier, [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/02/18/the-idea-of-two-sexes-is-simplistic-biologists-now-think-there-is-a-wider-spectrum-than-that/ <i>Nature</i> published a good article on the scientific consensus on the biology of sex], and comes down soundly on the side of defining it as a spectrum. You want to pretend it’s black and white? Fine. You don’t get to claim scientific standing for your beliefs. | <blockquote>Secondly, I do have a scientific background, and I don’t even know what it means to define "biological male" so absolutely. As I pointed out earlier, [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/02/18/the-idea-of-two-sexes-is-simplistic-biologists-now-think-there-is-a-wider-spectrum-than-that/ <i>Nature</i> published a good article on the scientific consensus on the biology of sex], and comes down soundly on the side of defining it as a spectrum. You want to pretend it’s black and white? Fine. You don’t get to claim scientific standing for your beliefs. | ||
Revision as of 00:16, 22 July 2020
- when: 2015/04/13
- author: PZ Myers
- source: Pharyngula
- topics: TERF
- keywords
- link: https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/04/13/i-guess-im-an-mra-now/
- title: I guess I'm an MRA now
- summary: First let me point out that the little tweet I chirped out was because the TERFs were flocking to me — I hadn’t barged into one of their conversations, or invited them to explain to me what makes for a real woman, but there they were, in my space. So she doesn’t get to complain about me violating boundaries.
Secondly, I do have a scientific background, and I don’t even know what it means to define "biological male" so absolutely. As I pointed out earlier, Nature published a good article on the scientific consensus on the biology of sex, and comes down soundly on the side of defining it as a spectrum. You want to pretend it’s black and white? Fine. You don’t get to claim scientific standing for your beliefs.
Thirdly, my comeback was brief because I see little point in arguing at length with bigots. She said having two X chromosomes made you female, an X and a Y makes you male, and that’s absolutely it. All I had to to was mention androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) to refute that.