Difference between revisions of "2022/02/04/SF basic income pilot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* '''when''': [[when posted::2022/02/02]] | * '''when''': [[when posted::2022/02/02]] | ||
* '''author''': [[author::Adele Peters]] | * '''author''': [[author::Adele Peters]] | ||
| − | * '''source''': [[ | + | * '''source''': [[source::FastCompany]] |
* '''topics''': [[topic::free income]] [[topic::US/CA/San Francisco]] [[topic::homelessness]] | * '''topics''': [[topic::free income]] [[topic::US/CA/San Francisco]] [[topic::homelessness]] | ||
* '''link''': [[URL::https://www.fastcompany.com/90717489/what-happened-after-these-unhoused-people-got-monthly-500-checks-two-thirds-have-homes]] | * '''link''': [[URL::https://www.fastcompany.com/90717489/what-happened-after-these-unhoused-people-got-monthly-500-checks-two-thirds-have-homes]] | ||
* '''title''': [[title::What happened after these unhoused people got monthly $500 checks? Two-thirds have homes]] | * '''title''': [[title::What happened after these unhoused people got monthly $500 checks? Two-thirds have homes]] | ||
| − | * '''summary''': [[Summary:: | + | * '''summary''': [[Summary::{{fmt/quote|The group predicted that the money would help reduce stress and improve food security, and it did. But two-thirds of the people who were unhoused when the pilot began also now have permanent housing. (The number has grown since the program first ended, when only a third had moved into new housing.)}} This was quite unexpected.]] |
{{page/link/footer}} | {{page/link/footer}} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:01, 8 June 2022
- when: 2022/02/02
- author: Adele Peters
- source: FastCompany
- topics: free income US/CA/San Francisco homelessness
- link: https://www.fastcompany.com/90717489/what-happened-after-these-unhoused-people-got-monthly-500-checks-two-thirds-have-homes
- title: What happened after these unhoused people got monthly $500 checks? Two-thirds have homes
- summary: «The group predicted that the money would help reduce stress and improve food security, and it did. But two-thirds of the people who were unhoused when the pilot began also now have permanent housing. (The number has grown since the program first ended, when only a third had moved into new housing.)» This was quite unexpected.