Difference between revisions of "2009-02-19 The New Book Banning"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "flag=including" to "flag=$including")
(updated data format and fixed munged chars)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<hide>
 
<hide>
<let name=data index=Date>2009-02-19</let>
+
{{page/link|article}}
<let name=data index=Author>Walter Olson</let>
+
[[title/short::The New Book Banning]]
<let name=data index=Source>City Journal</let>
+
</hide>
<let name=data index=Topics>\bad laws\Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act\overcaution\child safety</let>
+
* '''when''': [[when posted::2009-02-19]]
<let name=data index=URL>http://www.city-journal.org/2009/eon0212wo.html</let>
+
* '''author''': [[author::Walter Olson]]
<let name=data index=Title>The New Book Banning</let>
+
* '''source''': [[source::City Journal]]
<let name=data index=TitlePlain>The New Book Banning</let>
+
* '''topics''': [[topic::bad laws]] [[topic::Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act]] [[topic::overcaution]] [[topic::child safety]]
<let name=data index=Text><blockquote>
+
* '''link''': [[URL::http://www.city-journal.org/2009/eon0212wo.html]]
 +
* '''title''': [[title::The New Book Banning]]
 +
* '''summary''': [[Summary::&ldquo;under [[Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act|a law Congress passed last year]] aimed at regulating hazards in children's products, the federal government has now advised that children's books published before 1985 should not be considered safe and may in many cases be unlawful to sell or distribute.&rdquo;]]
 +
==Excerpt==
 +
<blockquote>
 
<p>Since the law became effective the very next day, there was no time to waste in putting this advice into practice. A commenter at [[Etsy]], the large handicrafts and vintage-goods site, observed how things worked at one store:</p>
 
<p>Since the law became effective the very next day, there was no time to waste in putting this advice into practice. A commenter at [[Etsy]], the large handicrafts and vintage-goods site, observed how things worked at one store:</p>
  
<blockquote>I just came back from my local thrift store with tears in my eyes! I watched as boxes and boxes of books were thrown into the garbage! Today was the deadline and I just believe it! Every book they had on the shelves prior to 1985 was destroyed! I managed to grab a 1967 edition of from the top of the box, but so many!</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>I just came back from my local thrift store with tears in my eyes! I watched as boxes and boxes of children's books were thrown into the garbage! Today was the deadline and I just can't believe it! Every book they had on the shelves prior to 1985 was destroyed! I managed to grab a 1967 edition of "The Outsiders" from the top of the box, but so many!</blockquote>
  
<p>People who deal in books for a livelihood now face unpleasant choices. Valerie Jacobsen of Clinton, Wisconsin, who owns a small used-book store and has sold over the Internet since 1995, [http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/cpsia-what-will-be-enforced/#comment-39954 commented] at my blog, [[Overlawyered]]: bookstore is the sole means of income for our family, and we currently have over 7,000 books catalogued. In our department, 35 percent of our picture books and 65 percent of our chapter books were printed before 1985.Jacobsen has contacted the [[Consumer Product Safety Commission|CPSC]] and her congressional representatives for guidance, but to no avail. cannot simply discard a wealth of our nineteenth and twentieth literature over this,she writes. She remains defiant, if wary: was willing to resist the censorship of ''[[Nineteen Eighty-Four|1984]]'' and the Fire Department of ''[[Fahrenheit 451]]'' long before I became a bookseller, so love to run a black market in quality at the same time it's not like the CPSC has never destroyed a small, harmless company before.</p>
+
<p>People who deal in children's books for a livelihood now face unpleasant choices. Valerie Jacobsen of Clinton, Wisconsin, who owns a small used-book store and has sold over the Internet since 1995, [http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/cpsia-what-will-be-enforced/#comment-39954 commented] at my blog, [[Overlawyered]]: "Our bookstore is the sole means of income for our family, and we currently have over 7,000 books catalogued. In our children's department, 35 percent of our picture books and 65 percent of our chapter books were printed before 1985." Jacobsen has contacted the [[Consumer Product Safety Commission|CPSC]] and her congressional representatives for guidance, but to no avail. "We cannot simply discard a wealth of our culture's nineteenth and twentieth children's literature over this," she writes. She remains defiant, if wary: "I was willing to resist the censorship of ''[[Nineteen Eighty-Four|1984]]'' and the Fire Department of ''[[Fahrenheit 451]]'' long before I became a bookseller, so I'd love to run a black market in quality children's books &ndash; but at the same time it's not like the CPSC has never destroyed a small, harmless company before."</p>
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
Line 18: Line 22:
  
 
Isn't there some provision for dealing with unexpectedly bad consequences of legislation? If not, there should be.
 
Isn't there some provision for dealing with unexpectedly bad consequences of legislation? If not, there should be.
</let>
 
 
 
</hide><if not flag=$including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>
 

Latest revision as of 13:34, 1 February 2022

Excerpt

Since the law became effective the very next day, there was no time to waste in putting this advice into practice. A commenter at Etsy, the large handicrafts and vintage-goods site, observed how things worked at one store:

I just came back from my local thrift store with tears in my eyes! I watched as boxes and boxes of children's books were thrown into the garbage! Today was the deadline and I just can't believe it! Every book they had on the shelves prior to 1985 was destroyed! I managed to grab a 1967 edition of "The Outsiders" from the top of the box, but so many!

People who deal in children's books for a livelihood now face unpleasant choices. Valerie Jacobsen of Clinton, Wisconsin, who owns a small used-book store and has sold over the Internet since 1995, commented at my blog, Overlawyered: "Our bookstore is the sole means of income for our family, and we currently have over 7,000 books catalogued. In our children's department, 35 percent of our picture books and 65 percent of our chapter books were printed before 1985." Jacobsen has contacted the CPSC and her congressional representatives for guidance, but to no avail. "We cannot simply discard a wealth of our culture's nineteenth and twentieth children's literature over this," she writes. She remains defiant, if wary: "I was willing to resist the censorship of 1984 and the Fire Department of Fahrenheit 451 long before I became a bookseller, so I'd love to run a black market in quality children's books – but at the same time it's not like the CPSC has never destroyed a small, harmless company before."

Looks like this thing was sponsored by a Democrat (Bobby Rush of Illinois), too.

Isn't there some provision for dealing with unexpectedly bad consequences of legislation? If not, there should be.