Difference between revisions of "Islamofascism"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Pat Condell on islamophobia; some clarification of terms)
(→‎Links: Nick Scipio images)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* '''2007-06-21''' [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR9LVf_KMO0 The myth of Islamophobia] by [[Pat Condell]]
 
* '''2007-06-21''' [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR9LVf_KMO0 The myth of Islamophobia] by [[Pat Condell]]
 
* '''2006-08-16''' [http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=081606C What Is 'Islamofascism'?] by Stephen Schwartz
 
* '''2006-08-16''' [http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=081606C What Is 'Islamofascism'?] by Stephen Schwartz
 +
===Photos===
 +
* [http://www.nickscipio.com/funstuff/archive24/2007-09-11_islamicliberals.html Nick Scipio - Picture of the Day]: Islamic protesters with extreme messages

Revision as of 20:14, 12 September 2007

Overview

Islamofascism is a form of religious extremism in which the faith of Islam is abusively used as a cover for a totalitarian ideology.[1], especially fascism.

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

It is generally synonymous with Islamic extremism, and has many similarities to Protestant fundamentalism.

Categorization

Links and other items having to do with Islam as an abusive force should probably be moved here; the Islam page is (ultimately) for items about the religion itself, according to its own written scripture and doctrines.

Terminology

It is not clear that there is any significant difference between Islamofascism and genuine Islamic fundamentalism, and so the latter term redirects here. Islamic doctrine, when interpreted literally and "fundamentally", would seem to be essentially fascistic in nature, in that:

  • it considers individual needs less important than unquestioning adherence
  • it seeks to promote unity of cultural and religious attributes

Hence "Islamic fundamentalism" is essentially a form of fascism. Discussion on the validity of equating these two terms is welcome, however.

Links

Editorials

Photos