Difference between revisions of "2014/03/07/Yet another ACA horror story draws scrutiny"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Forms/v3/news/entry)
 
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
</hide>
 
</hide>
 
* '''when''': [[when posted::2014/03/07]]
 
* '''when''': [[when posted::2014/03/07]]
* '''author''': [[author::]]
+
* '''author''': ''probably Rachel, but it's not credited''
* '''source''': [[site::The MaddowBlog]]
+
* '''source''': [[source::The MaddowBlog]]
 
* '''topics''': [[topic::Obamacare]] [[topic::US/AR]] [[topic::Americans for Prosperity]] [[topic::Mark Pryor]] [[topic::lies]]
 
* '''topics''': [[topic::Obamacare]] [[topic::US/AR]] [[topic::Americans for Prosperity]] [[topic::Mark Pryor]] [[topic::lies]]
 
* '''keywords'''  
 
* '''keywords'''  
 
* '''link''': [[URL::http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/yet-another-aca-horror-story-draws-scrutiny]]
 
* '''link''': [[URL::http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/yet-another-aca-horror-story-draws-scrutiny]]
* '''title''': [[title::Yet another ACA draws scrutiny]]
+
* '''title''': [[title::Yet another ACA "horror story" draws scrutiny]]
* '''summary''': <call func=smw.let.echo key=Summary>"After all the recent troubles conservatives have had with [[Obamacare]] in attack ads that turned out to be wrong, the [[Koch brothers|Koch]]-financed [[Americans for Prosperity]] push its luck with another dubious commercial, would it?"</call>
+
* '''summary''': [[Summary::{{fmt/quote|After all the recent troubles conservatives have had with "[[Obamacare]] victims" in attack ads that turned out to be wrong, the [[Koch brothers|Koch]]-financed [[Americans for Prosperity]] wouldn't push its luck with another dubious commercial, would it?}}]]
 +
==Excerpt==
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
<p>worth emphasizing that the pushback against deceptive advertising from the Affordable Care foes appear to have had some effect this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfQhtav0HJ8&noredirect=1 new AFP spot] is more restrained than many of its predecessors. (Unlike the [http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/when-facts-cant-be-true recent Michigan attack], this one falsely suggest the health care law will endanger the lives of cancer patients.)</p>
+
<p>It's worth emphasizing that the pushback against deceptive advertising from the [[Affordable Care Act]]'s foes appear to have had some effect &ndash; this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfQhtav0HJ8&noredirect=1 new AFP spot] is more restrained than many of its predecessors. (Unlike the [http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/when-facts-cant-be-true recent Michigan attack], this one doesn't falsely suggest the health care law will endanger the lives of cancer patients.)</p>
  
<p>Indeed, it was of great interest to see that this Arkansas spot steers clear of many factual claims that would draw the scrutiny of fact-checkers. The woman in the ad, for example, mention whether or not saving money, or whether any worse off than before.</p>
+
<p>Indeed, it was of great interest to see that this Arkansas spot steers clear of many factual claims that would draw the scrutiny of fact-checkers. The woman in the ad, for example, doesn�t mention whether or not she's saving money, or whether she's any worse off than before.</p>
  
<p>The offensive is more straightforward: Wanda had one health plan and now complaining about getting a new plan. it. the attack.</p>
+
<p>The offensive is more straightforward: Wanda had one health plan and now she's complaining about getting a new plan. That's it. That's the attack.</p>
  
 
...
 
...
  
<p>The total number of Arkansans whose health plans have been canceled as a result of the Affordable Care Act? According to the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]''tally, [http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/03/13/americans-for-prosperity-targets-pryors-support-for-health-law/ the answer is zero].</p>
+
<p>The total number of Arkansans whose health plans have been canceled as a result of the Affordable Care Act? According to the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'''s tally, [http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/03/13/americans-for-prosperity-targets-pryors-support-for-health-law/ the answer is zero].</p>
  
 
<p>In other words, the premise of this simple attack ad is [[false|at odds with reality]].</p>
 
<p>In other words, the premise of this simple attack ad is [[false|at odds with reality]].</p>
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
{{page/link/footer}}
 

Latest revision as of 20:11, 12 October 2022

Excerpt

It's worth emphasizing that the pushback against deceptive advertising from the Affordable Care Act's foes appear to have had some effect – this new AFP spot is more restrained than many of its predecessors. (Unlike the recent Michigan attack, this one doesn't falsely suggest the health care law will endanger the lives of cancer patients.)

Indeed, it was of great interest to see that this Arkansas spot steers clear of many factual claims that would draw the scrutiny of fact-checkers. The woman in the ad, for example, doesn�t mention whether or not she's saving money, or whether she's any worse off than before.

The offensive is more straightforward: Wanda had one health plan and now she's complaining about getting a new plan. That's it. That's the attack.

...

The total number of Arkansans whose health plans have been canceled as a result of the Affordable Care Act? According to the Wall Street Journal's tally, the answer is zero.

In other words, the premise of this simple attack ad is at odds with reality.