Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/LwaC"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 60: Line 60:
 
* '''2023-03-12''' [https://www.facebook.com/john.staddon.10/posts/pfbid02mazh6SQx7Wg1iGH3iVhP4QU7y5iLyD84K8FLnDVrw3KY19zwhhqWMhJoano75Chnl FB share] of [https://thespectator.com/topic/make-colleges-pay-biden-student-debt/ 2023-03-10 Make the colleges pay] (for student debt)
 
* '''2023-03-12''' [https://www.facebook.com/john.staddon.10/posts/pfbid02mazh6SQx7Wg1iGH3iVhP4QU7y5iLyD84K8FLnDVrw3KY19zwhhqWMhJoano75Chnl FB share] of [https://thespectator.com/topic/make-colleges-pay-biden-student-debt/ 2023-03-10 Make the colleges pay] (for student debt)
 
* '''2023-04-06''' [https://www.carolinajournal.com/opinion/speech-is-violence-and-some-ideas-cannot-be-challenged-really/ Some ideas can’t be challenged and ‘speech is violence.’ Really?]
 
* '''2023-04-06''' [https://www.carolinajournal.com/opinion/speech-is-violence-and-some-ideas-cannot-be-challenged-really/ Some ideas can’t be challenged and ‘speech is violence.’ Really?]
** via [https://www.facebook.com/carolinajournal/posts/pfbid022USBwtRrQqdver7J1Us7gz2ts5yt1sqVCvFrnww4NTwrBZ1Mfyy4yngn2yfT31tgl Carolina Journal] via [https://www.facebook.com/alvesdarocha César Rocha]
+
** '''my response''': [[cwre:Woozle/2023/04/29|Stanford's Intolerant Intolerance of Intolerance]]
 
+
* '''2023-04-14''' [https://www.facebook.com/john.staddon.10/posts/pfbid02ABS1mQZQE8gQyh4BAPn9kPnuEA9zRquyh1Dz4KdzTfqn5fZuFWDfKrai1jHEAh7Dl FB share] of [https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2023/04/14/never-mind-science-be-authentic/ Never Mind Science—Be Authentic]: it seems to me that science cannot exist without authenticity, so this sounds (unsurprisingly) like right-wing politics again
My response:
 
<blockquote>
 
There's a lot to unpack in this; I'll admit I'm struggling to figure out the chain of logic.
 
 
 
We start out with [https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-appointed-judge-wants-stanford-apologize-disrupted-speech-2023-03-11/ a Trump-appointed judge being invited to speak at Stanford] (why?). Students speak against this, and the event is cancelled. JS then makes allusions to speech being equated to violence, but he gives no exact quotes (at least not at that stage of the argument) to explain how this sequence of events relates to that equivalence nor does he even make it clear whether his statement that "Clearly speech can equal violence, and the speaker bears total responsibility for any effects it has on them" is intended ironically or sincerely.
 
 
 
In the next paragraph, he's suddenly talking about "the woke revolution" -- which is of course a fiction created by the right wing ("woke" being a trigger-word to create, in the mind of the audience, a negative association with whatever is being so labelled, bypassing any critical thinking that might be engaged if more meaningful words were used), but even granting for the sake of argument that it's a real thing,and also a problem, how does the former connect to the latter?
 
 
 
Perhaps this is explained later in the essay, but I feel like the lack of explanation is itself intended to make the reader feel inferior if they aren't clever enough to immediately see the connection for themselves -- doubtless leading many whose feelings have already been activated by the word "woke" to nod their heads and mutter angrily under their breath without any attempt at critical analysis.
 
 
 
Is there actually a logical argument being made here? If so, what is it?
 
</blockquote>
 
 
 
* '''2023-04-14''' [https://www.facebook.com/john.staddon.10/posts/pfbid02ABS1mQZQE8gQyh4BAPn9kPnuEA9zRquyh1Dz4KdzTfqn5fZuFWDfKrai1jHEAh7Dl FB share] of [https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2023/04/14/never-mind-science-be-authentic/?fbclid=IwAR0KGDq-D1Nia4okhMEzjCR03c2vvTy7V1ERoFLKEysG8EuXKcGH-SEnny0 Never Mind Science—Be Authentic]: it seems to me that science cannot exist without authenticity, so this sounds (unsurprisingly) like right-wing politics again
 
 
* '''2023-04-27'''
 
* '''2023-04-27'''
 
** [https://www.facebook.com/john.staddon.10/posts/pfbid0zNEBidbqtTJ3Mbn42qxve2E1zNKY8aoWRF8jExg5nsfE7LEJShVch8S9XAR6cmh1l FB share] of '''2023-04-19''' [https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/podcasts/the-leighton-smith-podcast/leighton-smith-podcast-episode-192-april-19th-2023/ The Leighton Smith Podcast: John Staddon, Professor of Biology and Psychology urges scientists to resist the demands for their unconditional surrender] (see [[Leighton Smith]]: {{l/wp/ref|Leighton Smith}})
 
** [https://www.facebook.com/john.staddon.10/posts/pfbid0zNEBidbqtTJ3Mbn42qxve2E1zNKY8aoWRF8jExg5nsfE7LEJShVch8S9XAR6cmh1l FB share] of '''2023-04-19''' [https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/podcasts/the-leighton-smith-podcast/leighton-smith-podcast-episode-192-april-19th-2023/ The Leighton Smith Podcast: John Staddon, Professor of Biology and Psychology urges scientists to resist the demands for their unconditional surrender] (see [[Leighton Smith]]: {{l/wp/ref|Leighton Smith}})
 
** [https://www.facebook.com/john.staddon.10/posts/pfbid035eEYJX7HaqRtj9uE2PGmDEFYF1XS1BXioGrdrQbmSiLy4LFaxjFnXMGnci5SPevRl FB share] of the same "be authentic" article, I guess in case we didn't see it the first time?
 
** [https://www.facebook.com/john.staddon.10/posts/pfbid035eEYJX7HaqRtj9uE2PGmDEFYF1XS1BXioGrdrQbmSiLy4LFaxjFnXMGnci5SPevRl FB share] of the same "be authentic" article, I guess in case we didn't see it the first time?
 +
* '''2023-05-02''' [https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2023/05/02/wikibias-how-wikipedia-erases-fringe-theories-and-enforces-conformity/ WikiBias: How Wikipedia erases “fringe theories” and enforces conformity]
 +
** '''my response''': [[cwre:Woozle/2023/05/02|Wikipedia Cruelly Silences Racist Speech]]

Latest revision as of 00:50, 3 May 2023

Lunch with a Conservatist

These are posts made in frustration about trying to have rational dialogue with my dad over lunch, which we were having more or less every week (at his request) over the course of more than a decade.

January through October 2016 were originally public; the rest were originally private in order to avoid confrontation. In July 2017, I decided I was done with that.

Note that I never identified him in any of the original public posts; I might have referred to him as "a relative" in comments on occasion. Even now I'm not giving his name. I could just link to Wikipedia, but that would be equivalent.

Prequel

Over the years before this, he had forwarded me many irritatingly counterfactual articles "for your amusement"; I wrote responses to some of them. Here's one:

2014

  • /2014-01-29 : an introduction of sorts to the haute right-wingiverse
  • /2014-02-01 (mainly link to a denialist article he sent me)
  • /2014-02-18 : Obama is arrogant and refused to negotiate during the "fiscal cliff" crisis; the Israelis are so much more civilized than those barbarous Palestinians
  • /2014-04-08 : employees ousting a CEO because of his beliefs is "fascism"
  • /2014-04-15 (you can skip this one too; very short)
  • /2014-05-29 : liberals are against free speech
  • /2014-05-30 : many claims
  • /2014-10-21 : Democrats are exactly as much in the pockets of the big corporations as the Republicans are; book idea
  • /2014-10-22 : he recognizes himself in my LwaC posts, and wants me to remove all of them (so much for freeze peach); this and subsequent posts are private
  • /2014-11-16 : I've avoided meeting with him for awhile; here, he agrees that I can arbitrarily rule subjects off-limits, and I agree to resume lunches

2015

2016

  • /2016-03-10 : a possible insight into the Republican votership; "science by consensus"
  • /2016-03-24 : me: Trump is the logical endpoint of Republican counterfactualism; him: "both sides are out of touch with reality"
  • /2016-03-25 : more claims from 3/24 - English law and self-defense; austerity counterfactualism
  • /2016-04-11 : (very short) are all cultures equally good? Do liberals believe they are?
  • /2016-05-12 : [now posting to SWoC] no "transgenders" have ever been attacked in restrooms, because he has never heard of any such thing
  • /2016-05-24 : my response to him, about HB2
  • /2016-05-26 : his infuriating response to that

Apparently this was where I made the decision (with support from my therapist) to discontinue our lunches.

Life with a Conservatist