Difference between revisions of "Operation Fast and Furious"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(massive reorg: timeline, moved some stuff to subpages) |
(a lot more explanation: stipulations, allegations, facts, conclusions) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
</hide> | </hide> | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | "[[Operation Fast and Furious]]", or just "Fast & Furious" (F&F), | + | "[[Operation Fast and Furious]]", or just "Fast & Furious" (F&F), was the name of an investigation run by ATF agents and federal prosecutors in Arizona whose purpose was to stop gun traffickers in [[Arizona]], the state ranked by the gun-control advocacy group [[Legal Community Against Violence]] as having the nation's "weakest gun violence prevention laws." |
| + | Scandal erupted when it was discovered that F&F operations had allowed thousands of guns to be sold to operatives of Mexican drug gangs who then smuggled them across the border for use in the drug war. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The scandal further escalated when agent [[Brian Terry]] was killed on {{date|2010-12-14}} in an attack by Mexican bandits on an elite US Border Patrol unit, leaving behind two semiautomatic rifles whose serial numbers indicated that they had been purchased 11 months earlier at a Phoenix-area gun store by a F&F suspect. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Stipulations=== | ||
| + | * Both sides agree that suspected straw purchasers under surveillance by the ATF repeatedly bought guns that eventually fell into criminal hands. | ||
| + | ** The disagreement is whether this was a deliberate strategy; five law-enforcement agents directly involved in Fast and Furious told ''Fortune'' magazine that the ATF had no such tactic. They insist they never purposefully allowed guns to be illegally trafficked. Just the opposite: They say they seized weapons whenever they could but were hamstrung by prosecutors and weak laws, which stymied them at every turn. | ||
| + | ===Allegations=== | ||
| + | A number of allegations have been made about the program and the events associated with it.. Unfortunately, the attackers have largely been more motivated by partisan politics than by any desire to find the truth, and it is often difficult to sort out the valid criticisms from the absurd. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Allegations against F&F include the following: | ||
| + | * '''gun-walking''': that the idea was to deliberately allow guns to fall into the hands of criminals in order to help to track down drug cartel leaders as part of the US government's pointless [[war on drugs]] | ||
| + | * '''deliberate bungle''': that the operation was deliberately mishandled by the [[Obama-Biden administration|administration]] in order to drum up support for stiffer [[gun control]] laws | ||
| + | * '''informants''': the ATF used informants to trigger strawman purchases | ||
| + | * '''dealer coercion''': the ATF coerced dealers into facilitating the illegal purchases (with threats of losing their licenses if they balked) | ||
| + | * '''guns to criminals''': the ATF allowed some 2000 firearms to fall into the hands of the drug cartels. | ||
| + | ===Relevant Facts=== | ||
| + | * Due to [[US Republican Party|Republican]] obstruction, the [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms|ATF]] has been without a full-time director. | ||
| + | * Lobbying against any kind of [[gun control]] efforts have hobbled efforts to track gun trafficking: | ||
| + | ** No federal statute outlaws [[firearms trafficking]] within the U.S., so agents must build cases against traffickers using a patchwork of often toothless laws. | ||
| + | ** The bill providing the ATF with funding explicitly prohibits it from creating an electronic database of gun sales, due largely to lobbying by the [[National Rifle Association|NRA]]. | ||
| + | ===Conclusions=== | ||
| + | * Given Arizona's lax gun laws and its proximity to Mexico where gun sales are illegal, it is almost inevitable that Mexican gangs would look to Arizona for guns, and that stopping them would be an almost impossible task -- and that anyone who tried would have powerful forces aligned against them on both sides of the border. | ||
| + | * The '''gun walking''' hypothesis seems unlikely at best; we are not aware of any evidence supporting it, and at least some evidence against it. | ||
| + | * It is not clear if the '''informants''' accusation suggests that the ATF did anything wrong. | ||
| + | * We have not yet seen the arguments supporting the '''dealer coercion''' hypothesis. | ||
| + | * The '''deliberate bungle''' hypothesis is absurd on the face of it, and also has no supporting evidence. | ||
| + | * The '''guns to criminals''' hypothesis has been stipulated as true by the ATF -- but it should be noted that this is a drop in the bucket: the Mexican government has estimated that 2,000 weapons are smuggled ''daily'' from the US into Mexico. | ||
| + | * F&F was part of the [[war on drugs]], an initiative with far more support among Republicans than Democrats. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If there is a scandal here, it is that Republicans have succeeded in tarring the Obama administration with the disastrous consequences of their own actions and policies. | ||
| + | ==History== | ||
The operation may have initially come to light when [[Fox News]] correspondent [[William La Jeunesse]] first advanced the ludicrous theory that F&F had been deliberately designed to go badly in order to stir up sentiment for tighter [[gun control]] laws.{{l/foot|2011-06-15-MM}} This theory has since been repeated by [[Ann Coulter]] and others, despite the lack of any evidence. | The operation may have initially come to light when [[Fox News]] correspondent [[William La Jeunesse]] first advanced the ludicrous theory that F&F had been deliberately designed to go badly in order to stir up sentiment for tighter [[gun control]] laws.{{l/foot|2011-06-15-MM}} This theory has since been repeated by [[Ann Coulter]] and others, despite the lack of any evidence. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 45: | ||
The US Inspector General's office issued a [[/Horowitz report|report]] finding considerable fault with the administration, but no evidence that it was deliberately fumbled. The [[Heritage Foundation]] issued [[/2012/09/21/HF|its own statement]] on the report, and did not seem to find it lacking. | The US Inspector General's office issued a [[/Horowitz report|report]] finding considerable fault with the administration, but no evidence that it was deliberately fumbled. The [[Heritage Foundation]] issued [[/2012/09/21/HF|its own statement]] on the report, and did not seem to find it lacking. | ||
| − | ==Timeline== | + | ===Timeline=== |
{| | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 49: | Line 81: | ||
|- style="background: #eee;" | |- style="background: #eee;" | ||
| − | | valign=top | '''2011-12- | + | | valign=top | '''2011-12-14''' |
| US border agent [[Brian Terry]] is killed | | US border agent [[Brian Terry]] is killed | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 106: | Line 138: | ||
| [http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2012/06/27/fast-and-furious-truth/?hpt=hp_t2 The truth about the Fast and Furious scandal]: "A ''Fortune'' investigation reveals that the ATF never intentionally allowed guns to fall into the hands of Mexican drug cartels. How the world came to believe just the opposite is a tale of rivalry, murder, and political bloodlust." | | [http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2012/06/27/fast-and-furious-truth/?hpt=hp_t2 The truth about the Fast and Furious scandal]: "A ''Fortune'' investigation reveals that the ATF never intentionally allowed guns to fall into the hands of Mexican drug cartels. How the world came to believe just the opposite is a tale of rivalry, murder, and political bloodlust." | ||
* [http://forums.hornfans.com/php/wwwthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=westmall&Number=6499686&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart= forum commentary] | * [http://forums.hornfans.com/php/wwwthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=westmall&Number=6499686&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart= forum commentary] | ||
| − | | [[CNN]] | + | | [[CNN]] / ''[[Fortune magazine|Fortune]]'' |
| debunking | | debunking | ||
Revision as of 01:33, 1 June 2013
About
"Operation Fast and Furious", or just "Fast & Furious" (F&F), was the name of an investigation run by ATF agents and federal prosecutors in Arizona whose purpose was to stop gun traffickers in Arizona, the state ranked by the gun-control advocacy group Legal Community Against Violence as having the nation's "weakest gun violence prevention laws."
Scandal erupted when it was discovered that F&F operations had allowed thousands of guns to be sold to operatives of Mexican drug gangs who then smuggled them across the border for use in the drug war.
The scandal further escalated when agent Brian Terry was killed on 2010-12-14 in an attack by Mexican bandits on an elite US Border Patrol unit, leaving behind two semiautomatic rifles whose serial numbers indicated that they had been purchased 11 months earlier at a Phoenix-area gun store by a F&F suspect.
Stipulations
- Both sides agree that suspected straw purchasers under surveillance by the ATF repeatedly bought guns that eventually fell into criminal hands.
- The disagreement is whether this was a deliberate strategy; five law-enforcement agents directly involved in Fast and Furious told Fortune magazine that the ATF had no such tactic. They insist they never purposefully allowed guns to be illegally trafficked. Just the opposite: They say they seized weapons whenever they could but were hamstrung by prosecutors and weak laws, which stymied them at every turn.
Allegations
A number of allegations have been made about the program and the events associated with it.. Unfortunately, the attackers have largely been more motivated by partisan politics than by any desire to find the truth, and it is often difficult to sort out the valid criticisms from the absurd.
Allegations against F&F include the following:
- gun-walking: that the idea was to deliberately allow guns to fall into the hands of criminals in order to help to track down drug cartel leaders as part of the US government's pointless war on drugs
- deliberate bungle: that the operation was deliberately mishandled by the administration in order to drum up support for stiffer gun control laws
- informants: the ATF used informants to trigger strawman purchases
- dealer coercion: the ATF coerced dealers into facilitating the illegal purchases (with threats of losing their licenses if they balked)
- guns to criminals: the ATF allowed some 2000 firearms to fall into the hands of the drug cartels.
Relevant Facts
- Due to Republican obstruction, the ATF has been without a full-time director.
- Lobbying against any kind of gun control efforts have hobbled efforts to track gun trafficking:
- No federal statute outlaws firearms trafficking within the U.S., so agents must build cases against traffickers using a patchwork of often toothless laws.
- The bill providing the ATF with funding explicitly prohibits it from creating an electronic database of gun sales, due largely to lobbying by the NRA.
Conclusions
- Given Arizona's lax gun laws and its proximity to Mexico where gun sales are illegal, it is almost inevitable that Mexican gangs would look to Arizona for guns, and that stopping them would be an almost impossible task -- and that anyone who tried would have powerful forces aligned against them on both sides of the border.
- The gun walking hypothesis seems unlikely at best; we are not aware of any evidence supporting it, and at least some evidence against it.
- It is not clear if the informants accusation suggests that the ATF did anything wrong.
- We have not yet seen the arguments supporting the dealer coercion hypothesis.
- The deliberate bungle hypothesis is absurd on the face of it, and also has no supporting evidence.
- The guns to criminals hypothesis has been stipulated as true by the ATF -- but it should be noted that this is a drop in the bucket: the Mexican government has estimated that 2,000 weapons are smuggled daily from the US into Mexico.
- F&F was part of the war on drugs, an initiative with far more support among Republicans than Democrats.
If there is a scandal here, it is that Republicans have succeeded in tarring the Obama administration with the disastrous consequences of their own actions and policies.
History
The operation may have initially come to light when Fox News correspondent William La Jeunesse first advanced the ludicrous theory that F&F had been deliberately designed to go badly in order to stir up sentiment for tighter gun control laws.2011-06-15-MM This theory has since been repeated by Ann Coulter and others, despite the lack of any evidence.
Criticism escalated "after a U.S. border agent, Brian Terry, was killed [on 2011-12-19] and two guns that ATF and prosecutors had allowed to "walk" as part of Fast and Furious turned up at the scene of the crime."3
Michelle Malkin appeared on Fox & Friends on 2012-06-21 to criticize the program, but the substance of her argument (stripped of emotional rhetoric) is so concise as to be undetectable. She also asserted that Obama was "at the center of it", and Democrats don't care about Brian Terry.
The US Inspector General's office issued a report finding considerable fault with the administration, but no evidence that it was deliberately fumbled. The Heritage Foundation issued its own statement on the report, and did not seem to find it lacking.
Timeline
Footnotes
- 2011-06-15-MM. Fox Hypes Bogus Theory That ATF Operation Meant To Lay Groundwork For Stricter Gun Laws
- 1. 2012-06-21 Michelle Malkin: 'Obama Is At The Center' Of The Fast And Furious Scandal
- 2. 2012-07-11 Fast and Furious Is Not a D.C. Law Firm
- 3. 2012-09-20 Fast and Furious Report Destroys Right-Wing Conspiracy Theories -- note that this article falsely claims "The operation was exposed after a U.S. border agent, Brian Terry, was killed". Terry was killed on 2011-12-19, but reporting on the operation began no later than 2011-06-13, when Fox first advanced the "gun control" theory.
Links
Reference
- Wikipedia
- Conservapedia
SourceWatch- Daily Kos: all posts tagged "fast and furious"
- TIME: all posts tagged "Fast and Furious"
- Right Wing Granny: all posts tagged "operation fast and furious"
