2008-07-18 Girls gone guilty

• when: 2008-07-18
• author: Greg Downey
• source: blogs/Neuroanthropology
• topics: human nature gender inequity mainstream media interpretive framing human sexuality evolutionary psychology women
• link: http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/07/18/girls-gone-guilty-evolutionary-psych-on-sex-2/
• title: Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex #2
• summary: “That is, if you went in with a different framework for explanation – like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" – you could construct another story around this data that was ... more plausible than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship'...”

Excerpt

That is, if you went in with a different framework for explanation – like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" – you could construct another story around this data that was equally plausible – no, more plausible – than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship' (errrr... except for the majority 54% who had positive experiences and the fact that they didn't see casual sex as a prelude to long-term relationships. Again, can someone explain to me why the evolutionary-programmed fembots were doing one-night gigs at all as it is inherently against their programming?).